236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20422184)
1. Partial volume correction strategies for quantitative FDG PET in oncology.
Hoetjes NJ; van Velden FH; Hoekstra OS; Hoekstra CJ; Krak NC; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2010 Aug; 37(9):1679-87. PubMed ID: 20422184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and Precision of Partial-Volume Correction in Oncological PET/CT Studies.
Cysouw MCF; Kramer GM; Hoekstra OS; Frings V; de Langen AJ; Smit EF; van den Eertwegh AJ; Oprea-Lager DE; Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2016 Oct; 57(10):1642-1649. PubMed ID: 27230933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of strategies towards harmonization of FDG PET/CT studies in multicentre trials: comparison of scanner validation phantoms and data analysis procedures.
Makris NE; Huisman MC; Kinahan PE; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Oct; 40(10):1507-15. PubMed ID: 23754762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Defining a radiotherapy target with positron emission tomography.
Black QC; Grills IS; Kestin LL; Wong CY; Wong JW; Martinez AA; Yan D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1272-82. PubMed ID: 15519800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeatability of
Pfaehler E; Beukinga RJ; de Jong JR; Slart RHJA; Slump CH; Dierckx RAJO; Boellaard R
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 30506687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Brain partial volume correction with point spreading function reconstruction in high-resolution digital PET: comparison with an MR-based method in FDG imaging.
Ibaraki M; Matsubara K; Shinohara Y; Shidahara M; Sato K; Yamamoto H; Kinoshita T
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Aug; 36(8):717-727. PubMed ID: 35616808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of methods for magnetic resonance-guided [18-F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in human carotid arteries: reproducibility, partial volume correction, and correlation between methods.
Izquierdo-Garcia D; Davies JR; Graves MJ; Rudd JH; Gillard JH; Weissberg PL; Fryer TD; Warburton EA
Stroke; 2009 Jan; 40(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 18927453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of list-mode reconstruction and image-space point spread function correction on PET image contrast and quantitative value using SiPM-based PET/CT system.
Shirakawa Y; Matsutomo N
Radiol Phys Technol; 2023 Sep; 16(3):384-396. PubMed ID: 37368168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subcentimeter tumor lesion delineation for high-resolution 18F-FDG PET images: optimizing correction for partial-volume effects.
Wallstén E; Axelsson J; Sundström T; Riklund K; Larsson A
J Nucl Med Technol; 2013 Jun; 41(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 23658206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Metabolic impact of partial volume correction of [18F]FDG PET-CT oncological studies on the assessment of tumor response to treatment.
Stefano A; Gallivanone F; Messa C; Gilardi MC; Gastiglioni I
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Dec; 58(4):413-23. PubMed ID: 24732680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 18F-FDG-PET partial volume effect correction using a modified recovery coefficient approach based on functional volume and local contrast: physical validation and clinical feasibility in oncology.
Anouan KJ; Lelandais B; Edet-Sanson A; Ruan S; Vera P; Gardin I; Hapdey S
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Sep; 61(3):301-313. PubMed ID: 26407135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does partial volume corrected maximum SUV based on count recovery coefficient in 3D-PET/CT correlate with clinical aggressiveness of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma?
Tsujikawa T; Otsuka H; Morita N; Saegusa H; Kobayashi M; Okazawa H; Nishitani H
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Jan; 22(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18250984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New standards for phantom image quality and SUV harmonization range for multicenter oncology PET studies.
Akamatsu G; Shimada N; Matsumoto K; Daisaki H; Suzuki K; Watabe H; Oda K; Senda M; Terauchi T; Tateishi U
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Feb; 36(2):144-161. PubMed ID: 35029817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a cumulative SUV-volume histogram method for parameterizing heterogeneous intratumoural FDG uptake in non-small cell lung cancer PET studies.
van Velden FH; Cheebsumon P; Yaqub M; Smit EF; Hoekstra OS; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2011 Sep; 38(9):1636-47. PubMed ID: 21617975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A cycle-consistent adversarial network for brain PET partial volume correction without prior anatomical information.
Sanaat A; Shooli H; Böhringer AS; Sadeghi M; Shiri I; Salimi Y; Ginovart N; Garibotto V; Arabi H; Zaidi H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Jun; 50(7):1881-1896. PubMed ID: 36808000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative assessment of methods for estimating tumor volume and standardized uptake value in (18)F-FDG PET.
Tylski P; Stute S; Grotus N; Doyeux K; Hapdey S; Gardin I; Vanderlinden B; Buvat I
J Nucl Med; 2010 Feb; 51(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 20080896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of image quality between step-and-shoot and continuous bed motion techniques in whole-body
Yamashita S; Yamamoto H; Nakaichi T; Yoneyama T; Yokoyama K
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 31(9):686-695. PubMed ID: 28815414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical implications of different image reconstruction parameters for interpretation of whole-body PET studies in cancer patients.
Schöder H; Erdi YE; Chao K; Gonen M; Larson SM; Yeung HW
J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):559-66. PubMed ID: 15073250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of point spread function reconstruction on quantitative 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging parameters and inter-reader reproducibility in solid tumors.
Sheikhbahaei S; Marcus C; Wray R; Rahmim A; Lodge MA; Subramaniam RM
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Mar; 37(3):288-96. PubMed ID: 26650959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of Point-Spread Function Modeling on PET Image Quality in Integrated PET/MR Hybrid Imaging.
Aklan B; Oehmigen M; Beiderwellen K; Ruhlmann M; Paulus DH; Jakoby BW; Ritt P; Quick HH
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 57(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 26471697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
