204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30466027)
1. Agreement between digital breast tomosynthesis and pathologic tumour size for staging breast cancer, and comparison with standard mammography.
Marinovich ML; Bernardi D; Macaskill P; Ventriglia A; Sabatino V; Houssami N
Breast; 2019 Feb; 43():59-66. PubMed ID: 30466027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic review of agreement between tomosynthesis and pathologic tumor size for newly diagnosed breast cancer and comparison with other imaging tests.
Marinovich ML; Macaskill P; Bernardi D; Houssami N
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2018 Jul; 15(7):489-496. PubMed ID: 29927337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective comparative trial of adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts (ASTOUND-2).
Tagliafico AS; Mariscotti G; Valdora F; Durando M; Nori J; La Forgia D; Rosenberg I; Caumo F; Gandolfo N; Sormani MP; Signori A; Calabrese M; Houssami N
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 104():39-46. PubMed ID: 30316869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography versus the combination of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Girometti R; Linda A; Conte P; Lorenzon M; De Serio I; Jerman K; Londero V; Zuiani C
Radiol Med; 2021 Nov; 126(11):1407-1414. PubMed ID: 34302599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of breast cancer presenting as a mass in women with dense breasts - digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography.
Babkina TM; Dykan IM; Gurando AV; Suleimenova DM; Kozarenko TM; Bozhok YM; Stuley VA
Exp Oncol; 2020 Sep; 42(3):215-219. PubMed ID: 32996743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast Cancers Found with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Comparison of Pathology and Histologic Grade.
Wang WS; Hardesty L; Borgstede J; Takahashi J; Sams S
Breast J; 2016 Nov; 22(6):651-656. PubMed ID: 27870337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value of Additional Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Preoperative Staging of Breast Cancer in Dense Breasts.
Krammer J; Stepniewski K; Kaiser CG; Brade J; Riffel P; Schoenberg SO; Wasser K
Anticancer Res; 2017 Sep; 37(9):5255-5261. PubMed ID: 28870962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An exploratory radiomics analysis on digital breast tomosynthesis in women with mammographically negative dense breasts.
Tagliafico AS; Valdora F; Mariscotti G; Durando M; Nori J; La Forgia D; Rosenberg I; Caumo F; Gandolfo N; Houssami N; Calabrese M
Breast; 2018 Aug; 40():92-96. PubMed ID: 29723697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rapid review: Estimates of incremental breast cancer detection from tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening in women with dense breasts.
Houssami N; Turner RM
Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():141-145. PubMed ID: 27721194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality.
Østerås BH; Skaane P; Gullien R; Martinsen ACT
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035006. PubMed ID: 29311416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biologic Profiles of Invasive Breast Cancers Detected Only With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Kim JY; Kang HJ; Shin JK; Lee NK; Song YS; Nam KJ; Choo KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1411-1418. PubMed ID: 28834445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening.
Haas BM; Kalra V; Geisel J; Raghu M; Durand M; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 23901124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis and breast ultrasonography in women with dense breasts: a prospective comparison study.
Kim WH; Chang JM; Lee J; Chu AJ; Seo M; Gweon HM; Koo HR; Lee SH; Cho N; Bae MS; Shin SU; Song SE; Moon WK
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Feb; 162(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 28083822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of DWI as a Rapid Unenhanced Technique for Detecting Mammographically Occult Breast Cancer in Elevated-Risk Women With Dense Breasts.
McDonald ES; Hammersley JA; Chou SH; Rahbar H; Scheel JR; Lee CI; Liu CL; Lehman CD; Partridge SC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):205-16. PubMed ID: 27077731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Staging of breast cancer and the advanced applications of digital mammogram: what the physician needs to know?
Helal MH; Mansour SM; Zaglol M; Salaleldin LA; Nada OM; Haggag MA
Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160717. PubMed ID: 28055247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
