BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30783863)

  • 1. The clinical significance of a pathologically positive lymph node at the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer.
    Patel A; Green N; Sarmah P; Langman G; Chandrakumaran K; Youssef H
    Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Feb; 23(2):151-159. PubMed ID: 30783863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of specific modes of circumferential resection margin involvement in rectal cancer local recurrence: A retrospective study.
    Suárez J; Goicoetxea A; Gómez ML; Jiménez G; Llanos MC; Jiménez J; Montes B; de Miguel M
    J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 118(7):1122-1128. PubMed ID: 30261110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Circumferential resection margin positivity due to direct or indirect tumour involvement in rectal cancer - a call for better stratification.
    Sadien ID; Ari K; Fernandes M; Paddock S; Sington J; Kapur S; Hernon J; Stearns AT; Shaikh IA
    ANZ J Surg; 2024 May; 94(5):931-937. PubMed ID: 38156719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Continuous Effect of Radial Resection Margin on Recurrence and Survival in Rectal Cancer Patients Who Receive Preoperative Chemoradiation and Curative Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.
    Sung S; Kim SH; Lee JH; Nam TK; Jeong S; Jang HS; Song JH; Lee JW; Bae JM; Lee JH
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Jul; 98(3):647-653. PubMed ID: 28581407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Circumferential margin plays an independent impact on the outcome of rectal cancer patients receiving curative total mesorectal excision.
    Lin HH; Lin JK; Lin CC; Lan YT; Wang HS; Yang SH; Jiang JK; Chen WS; Lin TC; Liang WY; Chang SC
    Am J Surg; 2013 Nov; 206(5):771-7. PubMed ID: 23871321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Circumferential margin involvement after total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer: are all R1 resections equal?
    Beaufrère A; Guedj N; Maggiori L; Patroni A; Bedossa P; Panis Y
    Colorectal Dis; 2017 Nov; 19(11):O377-O385. PubMed ID: 28941054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of circumferential resection margins on survival following rectal cancer surgery.
    Mois E; Graur F; Hajjar NA; Puia C; Cote A; Zaharie F; Bartos A; Momani NA; Pop F; Neagos H; Ciorogar G; Iancu C
    Ann Ital Chir; 2017; 88():. PubMed ID: 27941239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sparing Sphincters and Laparoscopic Resection Improve Survival by Optimizing the Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Patients.
    Keskin M; Bayraktar A; Sivirikoz E; Yegen G; Karip B; Saglam E; Bulut MT; Balik E
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Feb; 95(5):e2669. PubMed ID: 26844498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A single center retrospective study on surgical efficacy of T3NxM0 middle-low rectal cancer without neoadjuvant therapy].
    Liu P; Lou Z; Mei Z; Gao X; Hao L; Liu L; Gong H; Meng R; Yu E; Wang H; Wang H; Zhang W
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 22(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 30703796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Prognostic analysis of middle and lower rectal cancer with different degrees of infiltration in mesorectum].
    Zhuo HQ; Zhou YB; Lü L; Zhou J; Yang WY; Li YJ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 89(12):820-2. PubMed ID: 19595121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit.
    Nagtegaal ID; Marijnen CA; Kranenbarg EK; van de Velde CJ; van Krieken JH; ;
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2002 Mar; 26(3):350-7. PubMed ID: 11859207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Is a Robust Predictor of Poor Long-term Prognosis With Clinicopathological Bias Between Groups Compensated by Propensity-score Matching Analysis.
    Sugimoto K; Takahashi H; Yuki ; Irie T; Kawaguchi M; Kobari A; Amemiya K; Tsuchiya Y; Motegi S; Tsukamoto R; Honjo K; Okazawa YU; Kawai M; Ishiyama S; Takahashi M; Hoffman RM; Sakamoto K
    Anticancer Res; 2023 Aug; 43(8):3623-3630. PubMed ID: 37500146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lymph node ratio and surgical quality are strong prognostic factors of rectal cancer: results from a single referral centre.
    Leonard D; Remue C; Abbes Orabi N; van Maanen A; Danse E; Dragean A; Debetancourt D; Humblet Y; Jouret-Mourin A; Maddalena F; Medina Benites A; Scalliet P; Sempoux C; Van den Eynde M; De Schoutheete JC; Kartheuser A
    Colorectal Dis; 2016 Jun; 18(6):O175-84. PubMed ID: 27128602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prognostic value of the circumferential resection margin and its definitions in esophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
    Depypere L; Moons J; Lerut T; De Hertogh G; Peters C; Sagaert X; Coosemans W; Van Veer H; Nafteux P
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Feb; 31(2):. PubMed ID: 29036407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Metastatic pattern and new primary tumours after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery in rectal cancer.
    Frambach P; Pucciarelli S; Perin A; Zuin M; Toppan P; Maretto I; Urso EDL; Spolverato G
    Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 20(12):O326-O334. PubMed ID: 30230157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of the prognostic factors for low rectal cancer with the pT1-2NxM0 stage after abdominoperineal resection.
    Zhang XM; Ma C; Sun DY; Wang Z; Zhou ZX
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Jan; 27(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 25426977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lack of independent significance of a close (<1 mm) circumferential resection margin involvement in esophageal and junctional cancer.
    O'Farrell NJ; Donohoe CL; Muldoon C; Costelloe JM; King S; Ravi N; Reynolds JV
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):2727-33. PubMed ID: 23463085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Prognostic Value of Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Patients with Extraperitoneal Rectal Cancer.
    Shin DW; Shin JY; Oh SJ; Park JK; Yu H; Ahn MS; Bae KB; Hong KH; Ji YI
    Am Surg; 2016 Apr; 82(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 27097629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Distal Resection Margin of ≤1 mm and Rectal Cancer Recurrence After Sphincter-Preserving Surgery: The Role of a Positive Distal Margin in Rectal Cancer Surgery.
    Zeng WG; Liu MJ; Zhou ZX; Wang ZJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Nov; 60(11):1175-1183. PubMed ID: 28991082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patterns of failure in rectal cancer with positive circumferential resection margin after surgery following preoperative chemoradiation: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Kim Y; Kim DY; Kim TH; Kim SY; Baek JY; Kim MJ; Chang HJ; Cha Y; Park SC; Oh JH
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Dec; 91(1092):20180143. PubMed ID: 30129789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.