BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31147991)

  • 1. Breast Density in a Contemporary Cohort of Women With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS).
    Gooch JC; Chun J; Kaplowitz E; Kurz E; Guth A; Lee J; Schnabel F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(11):3472-3477. PubMed ID: 31147991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
    Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term Surveillance of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Detected with Screening Mammography versus US: Factors Associated with Second Breast Cancer.
    Choi SH; Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES; Park KW
    Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 31038406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) useful for diagnosis of additional sites of disease in patients recently diagnosed with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)?
    Benveniste AP; Ortiz-Perez T; Ebuoma LO; Sepulveda KA; Severs FJ; Roark A; Wang T; Sedgwick EL
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 96():74-79. PubMed ID: 29103479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation between sonographic findings and clinicopathologic and biologic features of pure ductal carcinoma in situ in 691 patients.
    Scoggins ME; Fox PS; Kuerer HM; Rauch GM; Benveniste AP; Park YM; Lari SA; Krishnamurthy S; Yang WT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):878-88. PubMed ID: 25794082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictors of Invasive Breast Cancer in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy.
    Shin YJ; Kim SM; Yun B; Jang M; Kim B; Lee SH
    J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Feb; 38(2):481-488. PubMed ID: 30069893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the association of mammographic density and clinical factors with ductal carcinoma in situ versus invasive ductal breast cancer in Korean women.
    Ko H; Shin J; Lee JE; Nam SJ; Nguyen TL; Hopper JL; Song YM
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Dec; 17(1):821. PubMed ID: 29207971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast-specific gamma imaging or ultrasonography as adjunct imaging diagnostics in women with mammographically dense breasts.
    Zhang Z; Wang W; Wang X; Yu X; Zhu Y; Zhan H; Chen Z; Li B; Huang J
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6062-6071. PubMed ID: 32524221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Clinical and Pathologic Characteristics of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Detected on Mammography versus Ultrasound Only in Asymptomatic Patients.
    Moon HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Yoon JH; Park VY
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 45(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 30322671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microcalcifications in 1657 Patients with Pure Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast: Correlation with Clinical, Histopathologic, Biologic Features, and Local Recurrence.
    Rauch GM; Hobbs BP; Kuerer HM; Scoggins ME; Benveniste AP; Park YM; Caudle AS; Fox PS; Smith BD; Adrada BE; Krishnamurthy S; Yang WT
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):482-9. PubMed ID: 26416712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinicopathologic, mammographic, and sonographic features in 1,187 patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast by estrogen receptor status.
    Rauch GM; Kuerer HM; Scoggins ME; Fox PS; Benveniste AP; Park YM; Lari SA; Hobbs BP; Adrada BE; Krishnamurthy S; Yang WT
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Jun; 139(3):639-47. PubMed ID: 23774990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive values of BI-RADS(®) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
    Badan GM; Piato S; Roveda D; de Faria Castro Fleury E
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1701-1707. PubMed ID: 27666605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Added Value of Breast MRI for Preoperative Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Diagnostic Performance on 362 Patients.
    Petrillo A; Fusco R; Petrillo M; Triunfo F; Filice S; Vallone P; Setola SV; Rubulotta M; Di Bonito M; Rinaldo M; D'Aiuto M; Brunetti A
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2017 Jun; 17(3):e127-e134. PubMed ID: 28111130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Histopathological characteristics of breast ductal carcinoma in situ and association with imaging findings.
    Tang X; Yamashita T; Hara M; Kumaki N; Tokuda Y; Masuda S
    Breast Cancer; 2016 May; 23(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 25644245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in a Contemporary Cohort of Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS).
    Darvishian F; Ozerdem U; Adams S; Chun J; Pirraglia E; Kaplowitz E; Guth A; Axelrod D; Shapiro R; Price A; Troxel A; Schnabel F; Roses D
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):3337-3343. PubMed ID: 31240590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of clinicopathological features on the predictive accuracy of conventional breast imaging in determining the extent of screen-detected high-grade pure ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Hayward L; Oeppen RS; Grima AV; Royle GT; Rubin CM; Cutress RI
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2011 Jul; 93(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 21943463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Menell JH; Morris EA; Dershaw DD; Abramson AF; Brogi E; Liberman L
    Breast J; 2005; 11(6):382-90. PubMed ID: 16297080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of radioactive iodine-125 seed localization in patients with non-palpable breast cancer: a comparison with the radioguided occult lesion localization with 99m technetium.
    van der Noordaa ME; Pengel KE; Groen E; van Werkhoven E; Rutgers EJ; Loo CE; Vogel W; Vrancken Peeters MJ
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 25707349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does Mammographic Density have an Impact on the Margin Re-excision Rate After Breast-Conserving Surgery?
    Edwards BL; Guidry CA; Larson KN; Novicoff WM; Harvey JA; Schroen AT
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):782-8. PubMed ID: 26471488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of
    Liu H; Zhan H; Sun D
    BMC Cancer; 2020 May; 20(1):463. PubMed ID: 32448217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.