674 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31418085)
1. Evaluation of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma in the explanted liver with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017.
Seo N; Kim MS; Park MS; Choi JY; Do RKG; Han K; Kim MJ
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):261-271. PubMed ID: 31418085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of LI-RADS Version 2018 Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Transplant Candidates: Intraindividual Comparison between CT and Hepatobiliary Agent-enhanced MRI.
Bae JS; Lee JM; Yoon JH; Kang HJ; Jeon SK; Joo I; Lee KB; Kim H
Radiology; 2021 May; 299(2):336-345. PubMed ID: 33650901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Adding Ancillary Features to MRI Compared with Enhancement Patterns at CT and MRI.
Park S; Joo I; Lee DH; Bae JS; Yoo J; Kim SW; Lee JM
Radiology; 2020 Sep; 296(3):554-561. PubMed ID: 32692297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. LI-RADS treatment response categorization on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: diagnostic performance compared to mRECIST and added value of ancillary features.
Kim SW; Joo I; Kim HC; Ahn SJ; Kang HJ; Jeon SK; Lee JM
Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2861-2870. PubMed ID: 32006170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Usefulness of Arterial Subtraction in Applying Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Treatment Response Algorithm to Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI.
Youn SY; Kim DH; Choi JI; Choi MH; Kim B; Shin YR; Oh SN; Rha SE
Korean J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 22(8):1289-1299. PubMed ID: 34047507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. LI-RADS v2017 categorisation of HCC using CT: Does moderate to severe fatty liver affect accuracy?
Kim SS; Hwang JA; Shin HC; Choi SY; Kang TW; Jou SS; Lee WH; Park S; Heo NH
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):186-194. PubMed ID: 30073499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Performance of CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2017 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Lee S; Kim SS; Roh YH; Choi JY; Park MS; Kim MJ
Liver Int; 2020 Jun; 40(6):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 32145134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incorporation of Ancillary MRI Features Into the LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm: Impact on Diagnostic Performance After Locoregional Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Kim YY; Kim MJ; Yoon JK; Shin J; Roh YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Mar; 218(3):484-493. PubMed ID: 34585608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Does quantitative assessment of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout improve LI-RADS v2018-based classification of liver lesions?
Stocker D; Becker AS; Barth BK; Skawran S; Kaniewska M; Fischer MA; Donati O; Reiner CS
Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2922-2933. PubMed ID: 32020398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2018: Impact on Categorization and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staging.
Chernyak V; Flusberg M; Berman J; Fruitman KC; Kobi M; Fowler KJ; Sirlin CB
Liver Transpl; 2019 Oct; 25(10):1488-1502. PubMed ID: 31344753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018, LI-RADS Version 2017, and OPTN Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Kierans AS; Song C; Gavlin A; Roudenko A; Lu L; Askin G; Hecht EM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Nov; 215(5):1085-1092. PubMed ID: 32877248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Using Perfluorobutane: Impact of Proposed Modified LI-RADS Criteria on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection.
Li L; Zheng W; Wang J; Han J; Guo Z; Hu Y; Li X; Zhou J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):434-443. PubMed ID: 35441534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimal imaging criteria and modality to determine Milan criteria for the prediction of post-transplant HCC recurrence after locoregional treatment.
Seo N; Joo DJ; Park MS; Kim SS; Shin HJ; Chung YE; Choi JY; Kim MS; Kim MJ
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):501-511. PubMed ID: 35821427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performance of MR for hepatocellular carcinoma based on LI-RADS v2018, compared with v2017.
Ren AH; Zhao PF; Yang DW; Du JB; Wang ZC; Yang ZH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Sep; 50(3):746-755. PubMed ID: 30648327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Can LI-RADS v2017 with gadoxetic-acid enhancement magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging improve diagnostic accuracy?
Zhang T; Huang ZX; Wei Y; Jiang HY; Chen J; Liu XJ; Cao LK; Duan T; He XP; Xia CC; Song B
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Feb; 25(5):622-631. PubMed ID: 30774276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What proportion of LI-RADS 5 observations reported in clinical practice do not meet LI-RADS 5 criteria?
Ghadimi M; Birnbaum J; Kamel IR; Sirlin CB; Chernyak V
Eur Radiol; 2022 May; 32(5):3327-3333. PubMed ID: 34807269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraindividual Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Using Perfluorobutane With Modified Criteria Versus CT/MRI LI-RADS Version 2018 for Diagnosing HCC in High-Risk Patients.
Li L; Mao S; Wang J; Zheng W; Shen J; Clevert DA; Zhou J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 May; 220(5):682-691. PubMed ID: 36382914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Per-patient Negative Predictive Value of the CT and MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2018 Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Hassan OT; Behr SC; Ohliger MA; Fowler KJ; Gill RM; Fidelman N; Mehta N; Choi HH
Radiology; 2023 Dec; 309(3):e222776. PubMed ID: 38112541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. LI-RADS Version 2017 versus Version 2018: Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetate Disodium-enhanced MRI.
Lee SM; Lee JM; Ahn SJ; Kang HJ; Yang HK; Yoon JH
Radiology; 2019 Sep; 292(3):655-663. PubMed ID: 31310175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging.
Lee S; Kim SS; Chang DR; Kim H; Kim MJ
Clin Mol Hepatol; 2020 Jul; 26(3):340-351. PubMed ID: 32492765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
