143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32917470)
1. Multi-parameter Sub-Hertz Analysis of Viscoelasticity With a Quality Metric for Differentiation of Breast Masses.
Bayat M; Nabavizadeh A; Nayak R; Webb JM; Gregory AV; Meixner DD; Fazzio RT; Insana MF; Alizad A; Fatemi M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 46(12):3393-3403. PubMed ID: 32917470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated In Vivo Sub-Hertz Analysis of Viscoelasticity (SAVE) for Evaluation of Breast Lesions.
Bayat M; Nabavizadeh A; Kumar V; Gregory A; Insana M; Alizad A; Fatemi M
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Oct; 65(10):2237-2247. PubMed ID: 29989938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Viscoelastic parameters as discriminators of breast masses: Initial human study results.
Kumar V; Denis M; Gregory A; Bayat M; Mehrmohammadi M; Fazzio R; Fatemi M; Alizad A
PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205717. PubMed ID: 30312358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio.
Stachs A; Hartmann S; Stubert J; Dieterich M; Martin A; Kundt G; Reimer T; Gerber B
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 23108926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic performances of shear wave elastography: which parameter to use in differential diagnosis of solid breast masses?
Lee EJ; Jung HK; Ko KH; Lee JT; Yoon JH
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jul; 23(7):1803-11. PubMed ID: 23423637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging.
Tanter M; Bercoff J; Athanasiou A; Deffieux T; Gennisson JL; Montaldo G; Muller M; Tardivon A; Fink M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1373-86. PubMed ID: 18395961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasonic viscoelasticity imaging of nonpalpable breast lesions.
Qiu Y; Insana MF
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():4424-7. PubMed ID: 19963829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pattern classification of ShearWave™ Elastography images for differential diagnosis between benign and malignant solid breast masses.
Tozaki M; Fukuma E
Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1069-75. PubMed ID: 22013011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic performance of ultrasound strain elastography for differentiation of malignant breast lesions.
Georgieva M; Prantl L; Utpatel K; Wiesinger I; Stroszczynski C; Jung F; Jung EM
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 71(2):237-247. PubMed ID: 30584133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic features of quantitative comb-push shear elastography for breast lesion differentiation.
Bayat M; Denis M; Gregory A; Mehrmohammadi M; Kumar V; Meixner D; Fazzio RT; Fatemi M; Alizad A
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0172801. PubMed ID: 28257467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sonoelastography in distinguishing benign from malignant complex breast mass and making the decision to biopsy.
Kim MY; Cho N; Yi A; Koo HR; Yun BL; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2013; 14(4):559-67. PubMed ID: 23901312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: value of shear wave elastography according to lesion stiffness combined with greyscale ultrasound according to BI-RADS classification.
Evans A; Whelehan P; Thomson K; Brauer K; Jordan L; Purdie C; McLean D; Baker L; Vinnicombe S; Thompson A
Br J Cancer; 2012 Jul; 107(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 22691969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Value of shear wave elastrography image classification in the diagnosis of breast masses].
Li TT; Kang CS; Li HZ; Xue JP; Yang QM; Lyu J
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 41(7):540-545. PubMed ID: 31357843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Real-time ultrasound elastography: its potential role in assessment of breast lesions.
Zhu QL; Jiang YX; Liu JB; Liu H; Sun Q; Dai Q; Chen X
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1232-8. PubMed ID: 18359145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography.
Chung SY; Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Jang M; Kim KG
Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 19929254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New elastographic classification of breast lesions during and after compression.
Fleury Ede F; Fleury JC; Piato S; Roveda D
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2009 Jun; 15(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 19517379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses.
Evans A; Whelehan P; Thomson K; McLean D; Brauer K; Purdie C; Jordan L; Baker L; Thompson A
Breast Cancer Res; 2010; 12(6):R104. PubMed ID: 21122101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography in discriminating malignant and benign breast lesions : Our experience with QelaXtoTM software.
Pesce K; Binder F; Chico MJ; Swiecicki MP; Galindo DH; Terrasa S
J Ultrasound; 2020 Dec; 23(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 32529557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
