169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33556995)
1. The cognitive and perceptual processes that affect observer performance in lung cancer detection: a scoping review.
Van De Luecht MR; Reed WM
J Med Radiat Sci; 2021 Jun; 68(2):175-185. PubMed ID: 33556995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Detection of Malignant Pulmonary Nodules in Chest Radiographs.
Yoo H; Kim KH; Singh R; Digumarthy SR; Kalra MK
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Sep; 3(9):e2017135. PubMed ID: 32970157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does Expectation of Abnormality Affect the Search Pattern of Radiologists When Looking for Pulmonary Nodules?
Littlefair S; Brennan P; Reed W; Mello-Thoms C
J Digit Imaging; 2017 Feb; 30(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 27659798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of a deep learning-based lung nodule detection system as an alternative reader in a Chinese lung cancer screening program.
Cui X; Zheng S; Heuvelmans MA; Du Y; Sidorenkov G; Fan S; Li Y; Xie Y; Zhu Z; Dorrius MD; Zhao Y; Veldhuis RNJ; de Bock GH; Oudkerk M; van Ooijen PMA; Vliegenthart R; Ye Z
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Jan; 146():110068. PubMed ID: 34871936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robust explanation supervision for false positive reduction in pulmonary nodule detection.
Zhao Q; Chang CW; Yang X; Zhao L
Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):1687-1701. PubMed ID: 38224306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inter-observer agreement on the morphology of screening-detected lung cancer: beyond pulmonary nodules and masses.
Rampinelli C; Minotti M; Ancona E; Preda L; Bertolotti R; Summers P; Raimondi S; Bagnardi V; Bellomi M
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jul; 29(7):3862-3870. PubMed ID: 31062136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterizing search, recognition, and decision in the detection of lung nodules on CT scans: elucidation with eye tracking.
Rubin GD; Roos JE; Tall M; Harrawood B; Bag S; Ly DL; Seaman DM; Hurwitz LM; Napel S; Roy Choudhury K
Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):276-86. PubMed ID: 25325324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lung nodule and cancer detection in computed tomography screening.
Rubin GD
J Thorac Imaging; 2015 Mar; 30(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 25658477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A review of lung cancer screening and the role of computer-aided detection.
Al Mohammad B; Brennan PC; Mello-Thoms C
Clin Radiol; 2017 Jun; 72(6):433-442. PubMed ID: 28185635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single-view 2D CNNs with fully automatic non-nodule categorization for false positive reduction in pulmonary nodule detection.
Eun H; Kim D; Jung C; Kim C
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Oct; 165():215-224. PubMed ID: 30337076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of automated lung nodule detection on low-dose computed tomography scans from a lung cancer screening program(1).
Armato SG; Roy AS; Macmahon H; Li F; Doi K; Sone S; Altman MB
Acad Radiol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 15766694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. EarlyCDT Lung blood test for risk classification of solid pulmonary nodules: systematic review and economic evaluation.
Duarte A; Corbett M; Melton H; Harden M; Palmer S; Soares M; Simmonds M
Health Technol Assess; 2022 Dec; 26(49):1-184. PubMed ID: 36534989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reporting instructions significantly impact false positive rates when reading chest radiographs.
Robinson JW; Brennan PC; Mello-Thoms C; Lewis SJ
Eur Radiol; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3654-9. PubMed ID: 26780639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT compared with positron emission tomography CT to characterise solitary pulmonary nodules: the SPUtNIk diagnostic accuracy study and economic modelling.
Gilbert FJ; Harris S; Miles KA; Weir-McCall JR; Qureshi NR; Rintoul RC; Dizdarevic S; Pike L; Sinclair D; Shah A; Eaton R; Clegg A; Benedetto V; Hill JE; Cook A; Tzelis D; Vale L; Brindle L; Madden J; Cozens K; Little LA; Eichhorst K; Moate P; McClement C; Peebles C; Banerjee A; Han S; Poon FW; Groves AM; Kurban L; Frew AJ; Callister ME; Crosbie P; Gleeson FV; Karunasaagarar K; Kankam O; George S
Health Technol Assess; 2022 Mar; 26(17):1-180. PubMed ID: 35289267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The performance of digital chest radiographs in the detection and diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and the consistency among readers].
Liang M; Zhao SJ; Zhou LN; Xu XJ; Wang YW; Niu L; Wang HH; Tang W; Wu N
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2023 Mar; 45(3):265-272. PubMed ID: 36944548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Pulmonary nodules detection assistant platform: An effective computer aided system for early pulmonary nodules detection in physical examination.
Han Y; Qi H; Wang L; Chen C; Miao J; Xu H; Wang Z; Guo Z; Xu Q; Lin Q; Liu H; Lu J; Liang F; Feng W; Li H; Liu Y
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Apr; 217():106680. PubMed ID: 35176595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision-making in pulmonary nodule detection.
Kundel HL; Nodine CF; Carmody D
Invest Radiol; 1978; 13(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 711391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An improved 3-D attention CNN with hybrid loss and feature fusion for pulmonary nodule classification.
Huang YS; Wang TC; Huang SZ; Zhang J; Chen HM; Chang YC; Chang RF
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Feb; 229():107278. PubMed ID: 36463674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of prior image induced nonlocal means regularization for low-dose CT reconstruction: Change in anatomy.
Zhang H; Ma J; Wang J; Moore W; Liang Z
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):e264-e278. PubMed ID: 28901622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Projected outcomes using different nodule sizes to define a positive CT lung cancer screening examination.
Gierada DS; Pinsky P; Nath H; Chiles C; Duan F; Aberle DR
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Nov; 106(11):. PubMed ID: 25326638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
