116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34210626)
1. Staging computerized tomography before delayed breast reconstruction could alter the management plan.
Iqbal J; Malahias MN; Alsharkawy K; Youssef S; Trigkatzis P; Shimal A; Pradhan P; Kalkat M; Khalil HH
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Dec; 74(12):3289-3299. PubMed ID: 34210626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New concept for immediate breast reconstruction for invasive cancers: feasibility, oncological safety and esthetic outcome of post-neoadjuvant therapy immediate breast reconstruction versus delayed breast reconstruction: a prospective pilot study.
Giacalone PL; Rathat G; Daures JP; Benos P; Azria D; Rouleau C
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jul; 122(2):439-51. PubMed ID: 20502959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incidental findings in CT angiograms for free DIEP flap breast reconstruction - Do they change our management?
Hughes JM; Smith JR; Jones L; Wilson S
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jan; 42(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 26603677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective study of mastectomy patients with and without delayed breast reconstruction: long-term psychosocial functioning in the breast cancer survivorship period.
Metcalfe KA; Zhong T; Narod SA; Quan ML; Holloway C; Hofer S; Bagher S; Semple J
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 111(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 25557452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Planar Bone Scan Versus Computerized Tomography in Staging Locally Advanced Breast Cancer in Asymptomatic Patients: Does Bone Scan Change Patient Management Over Computerized Tomography?
Bansal GJ; Vinayan Changaradil D
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 28786907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multicentre study of patient-reported and clinical outcomes following immediate and delayed Autologous Breast Reconstruction And Radiotherapy (ABRAR study).
Steele KH; Macmillan RD; Ball GR; Akerlund M; McCulley SJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Feb; 71(2):185-193. PubMed ID: 29203259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT staging for breast cancer patients with poor prognostic tumours.
James JJ; McMahon MA; Tennant SL; Cornford EJ
Breast; 2012 Dec; 21(6):735-8. PubMed ID: 22959310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the post-therapy surveillance of breast cancer.
Chang HT; Hu C; Chiu YL; Peng NJ; Liu RS
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e115127. PubMed ID: 25517451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does timing of alloplastic breast reconstruction in older women impact immediate postoperative complications? An analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database.
Angarita FA; Dossa F; Hermann N; McCready DR; Cil TD
Breast; 2019 Dec; 48():58-64. PubMed ID: 31526955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Overuse of Chest CT in Patients With Stage I and II Breast Cancer: An Opportunity to Increase Guidelines Compliance at an NCCN Member Institution.
Dull B; Linkugel A; Margenthaler JA; Cyr AE
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2017 Jun; 15(6):783-789. PubMed ID: 28596258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Considerations of previous augmentation in subsequent breast reconstruction.
Spear SL; Clemens MW; Dayan JH
Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(3):285-93. PubMed ID: 19083539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What Is the Clinical Importance of Incidental Findings on Staging CT Scans in Patients With Sarcoma?
Mayo Z; Kennedy S; Gao Y; Miller BJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Apr; 477(4):730-737. PubMed ID: 30601764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening mammography following autologous breast reconstruction: an unnecessary effort.
Freyvogel M; Padia S; Larson K; Dietz J; Grobmyer S; O'Rourke C; Valente S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):3256-60. PubMed ID: 25059787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of staging Computed Tomography on detection of occult metastasis in asymptomatic breast cancer patients.
Rajasooriyar C; Sritharan T; Chenthuran S; Indranath K; Surenthirakumaran R
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2020 Jun; 3(3):e1247. PubMed ID: 32671979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT provides powerful prognostic stratification in the primary staging of large breast cancer when compared with conventional explorations.
Cochet A; Dygai-Cochet I; Riedinger JM; Humbert O; Berriolo-Riedinger A; Toubeau M; Guiu S; Coutant C; Coudert B; Fumoleau P; Brunotte F
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Mar; 41(3):428-37. PubMed ID: 24196916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. (18) F-FDG PET/CT for initial staging in breast cancer patients - Is there a relevant impact on treatment planning compared to conventional staging modalities?
Krammer J; Schnitzer A; Kaiser CG; Buesing KA; Sperk E; Brade J; Wasgindt S; Suetterlin M; Schoenberg SO; Sutton EJ; Wasser K
Eur Radiol; 2015 Aug; 25(8):2460-9. PubMed ID: 25680729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discrepancy between FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT in the staging of patients with inflammatory breast cancer: implications for treatment planning.
Jacene HA; DiPiro PJ; Bellon J; Hu J; Cheng SC; Warren L; Schlosnagle E; Nakhlis F; Rosenbluth JM; Yeh E; Overmoyer B
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jun; 181(2):383-390. PubMed ID: 32318957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immediate versus delayed autologous breast reconstruction: A retrospective matched cohort study of irradiated patients.
Dewael S; Vandevoort M; Fabré G; Nanhekhan L
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Nov; 72(11):1769-1775. PubMed ID: 31235319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retrospective analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging asymptomatic breast cancer patients younger than 40 years.
Riedl CC; Slobod E; Jochelson M; Morrow M; Goldman DA; Gonen M; Weber WA; Ulaner GA
J Nucl Med; 2014 Oct; 55(10):1578-83. PubMed ID: 25214641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiological findings on irradiation-CT in patients with non metastatic breast cancer.
Meyer HJ; Uhlig J; Schramm D; Bach AG; Surov A
Br J Radiol; 2017 Jul; 90(1075):20170162. PubMed ID: 28511549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
