284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34837348)
1. 12-year review of MRI-detected breast cancers. How often was a diagnosis of malignancy established using targeted ultrasound and standard 14-gauge core biopsy?
Price J
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2022 Sep; 66(6):738-748. PubMed ID: 34837348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the underestimation rate in cases with ductal carcinoma in situ at ultrasound-guided core biopsy: 14-gauge automated core-needle biopsy vs 8- or 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Suh YJ; Kim MJ; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Kwak JY; Koo HR; Yoon JH
Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):e349-56. PubMed ID: 22422382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: breast DCE-MRI can be used to reduce unnecessary open surgical excision.
Bertani V; Urbani M; La Grassa M; Balestreri L; Berger N; Frauenfelder T; Boss A; Marcon M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):4069-4081. PubMed ID: 32144463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 268 nonpalpable lesions.
Tonegutti M; Girardi V
Radiol Med; 2008 Feb; 113(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 18338128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. US-guided 14G core needle biopsy: comparison between underestimated and correctly diagnosed breast cancers.
Kim H; Youk JH; Kim JA; Gweon HM; Jung WH; Son EJ
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(7):3179-83. PubMed ID: 24815467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benign Papillomas of the Breast Diagnosed on Large-Gauge Vacuum Biopsy compared with 14 Gauge Core Needle Biopsy - Do they require surgical excision?
Seely JM; Verma R; Kielar A; Smyth KR; Hack K; Taljaard M; Gravel D; Ellison E
Breast J; 2017 Mar; 23(2):146-153. PubMed ID: 27797135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast Microcalcifications: Diagnostic Outcomes According to Image-Guided Biopsy Method.
Bae S; Yoon JH; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Kim EK
Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(5):996-1005. PubMed ID: 26357494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasound-guided cable-free 13-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy of non-mass breast lesions.
Seo J; Kim SM; Jang M; Yun B; Lee SH; Kim EK; Kang E; Park SY; Moon WK; Choi HY; Kim B
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179182. PubMed ID: 28628656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of magnetic resonance computer-aided diagnosis for preoperatively determining invasive disease in ultrasonography-guided core needle biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ.
Ahn HS; Kim SM; Kim MS; Jang M; Yun B; Kang E; Kim EK; Park SY; Kim B
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jul; 99(31):e21257. PubMed ID: 32756104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Imaging and pathologic features of non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: can sonography predict upgrade?
Komarla R; Gilliland L; Piraner M; Seidel R; Clifford K; Kunjummen J
Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20211013. PubMed ID: 34870448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study.
Fajardo LL; Pisano ED; Caudry DJ; Gatsonis CA; Berg WA; Connolly J; Schnitt S; Page DL; McNeil BJ;
Acad Radiol; 2004 Mar; 11(3):293-308. PubMed ID: 15035520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the clinical and pathological characteristics of ultrasound-guided biopsy for breast masses and non-mass lesions between 16-gauge spring-loaded core needle biopsy and 12-gauge spring-loaded vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Yashima Y; Fujioka T; Kubota K; Mori M; Sato A; Oda G; Nakagawa T; Onishi I; Tanaka M; Tateishi U
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2023 Apr; 50(2):205-212. PubMed ID: 36645627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) useful for diagnosis of additional sites of disease in patients recently diagnosed with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)?
Benveniste AP; Ortiz-Perez T; Ebuoma LO; Sepulveda KA; Severs FJ; Roark A; Wang T; Sedgwick EL
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 96():74-79. PubMed ID: 29103479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging-Concordant Benign MRI-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy May Not Warrant MRI Follow-Up.
Huang ML; Speer M; Dogan BE; Rauch GM; Candelaria RP; Adrada BE; Hess KR; Yang WT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Apr; 208(4):916-922. PubMed ID: 28140609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrieval rate and accuracy of ultrasound-guided 14-G semi-automated core needle biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
Yi J; Lee EH; Kwak JJ; Cha JG; Jung SH
Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 24497787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High rate of postoperative upstaging of ductal carcinoma in situ when prioritizing ultrasound evaluation of mammography-detected lesions: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Hsieh YC; Lo C; Lee YH; Chien N; Lu TP; Tsai LW; Wang MY; Kuo WH; Chang YC; Huang CS
World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Feb; 21(1):48. PubMed ID: 36804000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benign breast papillomas without atypia diagnosed with core needle biopsy: Outcome of surgical excision and imaging follow-up.
Polat DS; Knippa EE; Ganti R; Seiler SJ; Goudreau SH
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Oct; 131():109237. PubMed ID: 32905954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: is it an essential technique?
Tozaki M; Yamashiro N; Suzuki T; Kawano N; Ozaki S; Sakamoto N; Abe S; Ogawa T; Katayama N; Tsunoda Y; Fukuma E
Breast Cancer; 2009; 16(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 18807122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is not necessary in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast by stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Kotani H; Yoshimura A; Adachi Y; Ishiguro J; Hisada T; Ichikawa M; Gondou N; Hattori M; Kondou N; Sawaki M; Fujita T; Iwata H
Breast Cancer; 2016 Mar; 23(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 24989112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy of Architectural Distortion Without a Sonographic Correlate: A Retrospective Review.
Ambinder EB; Plotkin A; Euhus D; Mullen LA; Oluyemi E; Di Carlo P; Philip M; Panigrahi B; Cimino-Mathews A; Myers KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Oct; 217(4):845-854. PubMed ID: 33147055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
