28 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35466146)
1. MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: comparison with stereotactically guided and ultrasound-guided techniques.
Imschweiler T; Haueisen H; Kampmann G; Rageth L; Seifert B; Rageth C; Freiwald B; Kubik-Huch RA
Eur Radiol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):128-35. PubMed ID: 23979106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR imaging-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: reduction of false-negative biopsies by short-term control MRI 24-48 h after biopsy.
Bahrs SD; Hattermann V; Preibsch H; Hahn M; Staebler A; Claussen CD; Siegmann-Luz KC
Clin Radiol; 2014 Jul; 69(7):695-702. PubMed ID: 24679372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the underestimation rate in cases with ductal carcinoma in situ at ultrasound-guided core biopsy: 14-gauge automated core-needle biopsy vs 8- or 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Suh YJ; Kim MJ; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Kwak JY; Koo HR; Yoon JH
Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):e349-56. PubMed ID: 22422382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast Microcalcifications: Diagnostic Outcomes According to Image-Guided Biopsy Method.
Bae S; Yoon JH; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Kim EK
Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(5):996-1005. PubMed ID: 26357494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast lesions with imaging-histologic discordance during 16-gauge core needle biopsy system: would vacuum-assisted removal get significantly more definitive histologic diagnosis than vacuum-assisted biopsy?
Wang ZL; Liu G; Li JL; Su L; Liu XJ; Wang W; Tang J
Breast J; 2011; 17(5):456-61. PubMed ID: 21762244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. False-negatives due to poor specimens can be prevented based on the macroscopic findings for breast Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy specimens.
Izumori A; Takahashi M; Sasa S; Inoue H; Tangoku A; Kanematsu M; Sasa M
J Med Invest; 2022; 69(1.2):51-64. PubMed ID: 35466146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advances in Ultrasound-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy of Breast Microcalcifications.
Wu J; Kong R; Tian S; Li H; Liu JS; Xu Z; Zou BS; Wu KN; Kong LQ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 May; 47(5):1172-1181. PubMed ID: 33549383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiating vacuum-assisted breast biopsy from core needle biopsy: Is it necessary?
Nakano S; Imawari Y; Mibu A; Otsuka M; Oinuma T
Br J Radiol; 2018 Dec; 91(1092):20180250. PubMed ID: 29975150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Evolving Role of Vacuum Assisted Biopsy of the Breast: A Progression from Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy.
Bennett IC; Saboo A
World J Surg; 2019 Apr; 43(4):1054-1061. PubMed ID: 30617562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How to choose needles and probes for ultrasonographically guided percutaneous breast biopsy: a systematic approach.
Uematsu T
Breast Cancer; 2012 Jul; 19(3):238-41. PubMed ID: 22322427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of ultrasound-guided, large-core needle breast biopsy.
Schueller G; Schueller-Weidekamm C; Helbich TH
Eur Radiol; 2008 Sep; 18(9):1761-73. PubMed ID: 18414872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Stereotactically and sonographically guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a national consensus for Austria].
Helbich TH; Buchberger W; Rudas M;
Rofo; 2002 Apr; 174(4):517-22. PubMed ID: 12465616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
