114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37390283)
1. The diagnostic value of BI-RADS grade 3 to 5 for breast masses is correlated with the expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2.
He T; Shi T; Luo W; Ju Y; Li R
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Jun; 102(26):e33208. PubMed ID: 37390283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic and Predictive Values of Strain Ratios in the Regions of Interests in Reference Tissue for Breast Tumor.
Wang H; Li CY; Zha HL; Xu D; Hu ZB
Cancer Manag Res; 2021; 13():1017-1028. PubMed ID: 33574701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation Between
Yu P; Lei J; Xu B; Wang R; Shen Z; Tian J
Acad Radiol; 2020 May; 27(5):682-688. PubMed ID: 31311773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [An analysis of breast cancer patients with ultrasound BI-RADS 3 lesions after minimally invasive excision in clinicopathological features and influencing factors of residual tumor].
Li L; Feng ZQ; Zhang LF; Wang RQ; Zhang XX; Liu LY; Yu LX; Yu ZG; Gao ZC
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 62(2):135-140. PubMed ID: 38310381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A single centre experience in Turkey for comparison between core needle biopsy and surgical specimen evaluation results for HER2, SISH, estrogen receptors and progesterone receptors in breast cancer patients.
Karaman H; Senel F; Tasdemir A; Özer I; Dogan M
J Cancer Res Ther; 2022; 18(6):1789-1795. PubMed ID: 36412445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical impact of BI-RADS classification in Taiwanese breast cancer patients: BI-RADS 5 versus BI-RADS 0-4.
Kuo YL; Cheng L; Chang TW
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1504-7. PubMed ID: 21477958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of mammography and ultrasonography and their BI-RADS in detection of breast malignancy.
Ghaemian N; Haji Ghazi Tehrani N; Nabahati M
Caspian J Intern Med; 2021; 12(4):573-579. PubMed ID: 34820065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationships Between MRI Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Lexicon Descriptors and Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: Internal Enhancement is Associated with Luminal B Subtype.
Grimm LJ; Zhang J; Baker JA; Soo MS; Johnson KS; Mazurowski MA
Breast J; 2017 Sep; 23(5):579-582. PubMed ID: 28295860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Diagnostic Value of 3D Power Doppler Ultrasound Combined With VOCAL in the Vascular Distribution of Breast Masses.
Wang H; Yan B; Yue L; He M; Liu Y; Li H
Acad Radiol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 31053481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Diagnostic values of breast imaging and reporting data system and ultrasonic elastography for benign and malignant breast lesions].
Yang M; Gu XN; Liu F; Wang YY; Cai YL; Liu DM; Zhou WJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Oct; 93(39):3125-7. PubMed ID: 24417992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status between core needle and open excision biopsy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.
Chen X; Yuan Y; Gu Z; Shen K
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Aug; 134(3):957-67. PubMed ID: 22370627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Value of Elastography Strain Ratio Combined with Breast Ultrasound Imaging Reporting and Data System in the Diagnosis of Breast Nodules].
Liu J; Wu JP; Wang N; Li GH; Wang XH; Wang Y; Zheng M; Zhang B
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2021 Feb; 43(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 33663665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value of ultrasound BI‑RADS classification in preoperative evaluation of the ultrasound‑guided Mammotome‑assisted minimally invasive resection of breast masses: A retrospective analysis.
Wang H; Wang Q; Zhang Y; Peng Y
Exp Ther Med; 2023 Apr; 25(4):143. PubMed ID: 36911377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of BI-RADS Ultrasound Subcategories 4A to 4C in Predicting Breast Cancer.
Spinelli Varella MA; Teixeira da Cruz J; Rauber A; Varella IS; Fleck JF; Moreira LF
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Aug; 18(4):e507-e511. PubMed ID: 29066139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) play a better role in diagnosis of breast lesions with calcification? A comparison with MRI.
Pan J; Tong W; Luo J; Liang J; Pan F; Zheng Y; Xie X
Br J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 93(1112):20200195. PubMed ID: 32463295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in breast lesions of BI-RADS 4].
Liang YC; Jia CM; Xue Y; Lü Q; Chen F; Wang JJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 May; 98(19):1498-1502. PubMed ID: 29804418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and Upgrading of CNB and BI-RADS Diagnoses Compared to Excision: A Clinicopathological-Radiological Correlation of Papillary Breast Lesions and Neoplasms.
Fawzy MM; Sheta H; Abd El Hafez A; Harb D; Zuhdy M; Alghandour R; Sakr DH
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Nov; 23(11):3959-3969. PubMed ID: 36444611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Novel approach in the evaluation of ultrasound BI-RADS 3 & 4 breast masses with a combination method of elastography & Doppler.
Reghunath A; Mittal MK; Chintamani C; Prasad R
Indian J Med Res; 2021 Aug; 154(2):355-366. PubMed ID: 34854427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adding a Model-free Diffusion MRI Marker to BI-RADS Assessment Improves Specificity for Diagnosing Breast Lesions.
Goto M; Le Bihan D; Yoshida M; Sakai K; Yamada K
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 31112086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Color-map virtual touch tissue imaging (CMV) combined with BI-RADS for the diagnosis of breast lesions.
Lian KM; Lin T
J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(3):447-457. PubMed ID: 35147574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
