65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37394083)
1. Analytic Hierarchy Process Analysis of Patient Preferences for Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus MRI as Supplemental Screening Options for Breast Cancer.
Berg WA; Bandos AI; Sava MG
J Am Coll Radiol; 2023 Aug; 20(8):758-768. PubMed ID: 37394083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient Experience of Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
Miller MM; Mayorov S; Ganti R; Nguyen JV; Rochman CM; Caley M; Jahjah J; Repich K; Patrie JT; Anderson RT; Harvey JA; Rooney TB
J Breast Imaging; 2024 May; 6(3):277-287. PubMed ID: 38537570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Locoregional staging of breast cancer: contrast-enhanced mammography versus breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Terzoni A; Basile P; Gambaro AC; Attanasio S; Rampi AM; Brambilla M; Carriero A
Radiol Med; 2024 Apr; 129(4):558-565. PubMed ID: 38512618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-enhanced mammography in the assessment of residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment.
Hogan MP; Horvat JV; Ross DS; Sevilimedu V; Jochelson MS; Kirstein LJ; Goldfarb SB; Comstock CE; Sung JS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Apr; 198(2):349-359. PubMed ID: 36754936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art.
Jochelson MS; Lobbes MBI
Radiology; 2021 Apr; 299(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 33650905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Role of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography After Cryoablation of Breast Cancer.
Corines MJ; Sogani J; Hogan MP; Mango VL; Bryce Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2024 Feb; 222(2):e2330250. PubMed ID: 38019473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. State-of-the-art for contrast-enhanced mammography.
Covington MF; Salmon S; Weaver BD; Fajardo LL
Br J Radiol; 2024 Mar; 97(1156):695-704. PubMed ID: 38374651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus MR Imaging of the Breast.
Mann RM; Longo V
Radiol Clin North Am; 2024 Jul; 62(4):643-659. PubMed ID: 38777540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of contrast-enhanced mammography for detecting multifocal and multicentric breast cancer and evaluating tumour size, and implications for surgical management: Early experience in a tertiary centre.
Thanh Ha Nguyen M; Varma N; Lan Cheong Wah D; Chew R; Botha T; Kouloyan-Ilic S; Paiva J
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2024 Mar; 68(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 38146085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast Cancer Supplemental Screening: Contrast-Enhanced Mammography or Contrast-Enhanced MRI?
Rashidi A; Lowry KP; Sadigh G
J Am Coll Radiol; 2024 Apr; 21(4):589-590. PubMed ID: 37839693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Barriers to Implementation of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography in Clinical Practice:
van Nijnatten TJA; Lobbes MBI; Cozzi A; Patel BK; Zuley ML; Jochelson MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jul; 221(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 36448912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Performance in Diagnosis and Characterization of Breast Lesions: Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Açar ÇR; Orguc S
Clin Breast Cancer; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38777678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MR-contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) for follow-up of breast cancer patients: a "pros and cons" debate.
Camps-Herrero J; Pijnappel R; Balleyguier C
Eur Radiol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38488968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Correlation between Morpho-Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) Features and Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.
Piccolo CL; Celli I; Bandini C; Tommasiello M; Sammarra M; Faggioni L; Cioni D; Beomonte Zobel B; Neri E
Cancers (Basel); 2024 Feb; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 38473232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evolutionary Reasons for Male Preferences Regarding the Female Breast Shape.
Basile FV
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2015 Oct; 3(10):e542. PubMed ID: 26579348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A pictorial guide to artifacts on contrast mammography: How to avoid pitfalls and improve interpretation.
Bennett C; Woodard S; Zamora K
Clin Imaging; 2023 Sep; 101():215-222. PubMed ID: 37429167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Can the addition of tomosynthesis improve the accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography? A comparison with breast MRI.
Savaridas SL; Vinnicombe SJ; Warwick V; Evans A
Br J Radiol; 2023 Aug; 96(1148):20220921. PubMed ID: 37399083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Why don't all women with extremely dense breasts want MRI screening?
Berg WA
Eur Radiol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38700696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Addition of Contrast-enhanced Mammography to Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection in Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer: Prospective TOCEM Trial Interim Analysis.
Berg WA; Berg JM; Bandos AI; Vargo A; Chough DM; Lu AH; Ganott MA; Kelly AE; Nair BE; Hartman JY; Waheed U; Hakim CM; Harnist KS; Reginella RF; Shinde DD; Carlin BA; Cohen CS; Wallace LP; Sumkin JH; Zuley ML
Radiology; 2024 Apr; 311(1):e231991. PubMed ID: 38687218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Re-attendance in supplemental breast MRI screening rounds of the DENSE trial for women with extremely dense breasts.
Veenhuizen SGA; van Grinsven SEL; Laseur IL; Bakker MF; Monninkhof EM; de Lange SV; Pijnappel RM; Mann RM; Lobbes MBI; Duvivier KM; de Jong MDF; Loo CE; Karssemeijer N; van Diest PJ; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH;
Eur Radiol; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38639912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
