118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37925299)
1. Implementation and evaluation of an iterative-based algorithm for automatic beam angle optimization in breast cancer treatment planning.
Guo Y; Zhong Y; Yu L; Zhang K; Wang J; Hu W
Med Dosim; 2024 Summer; 49(2):127-138. PubMed ID: 37925299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A dosimetric comparison of the use of equally spaced beam (ESB), beam angle optimization (BAO), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in head and neck cancers treated by intensity modulated radiotherapy.
Leung WS; Wu VWC; Liu CYW; Cheng ACK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):121-130. PubMed ID: 31593367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of dose calculation accuracy during optimization on lung IMRT plan quality.
Li Y; Rodrigues A; Li T; Yuan L; Yin FF; Wu QJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 16(1):5137. PubMed ID: 25679172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy.
Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Wu Q; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1325-37. PubMed ID: 15519806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cardiac Dose Control and Optimization Strategy for Left Breast Cancer Radiotherapy With Non-Uniform VMAT Technology.
Qiu J; Zhang S; Lv B; Zheng X
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2021; 20():15330338211053752. PubMed ID: 34806481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Lung IMRT planning with automatic determination of beam angle configurations.
Yuan L; Zhu W; Ge Y; Jiang Y; Sheng Y; Yin FF; Wu QJ
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(13):135024. PubMed ID: 29846178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Uncertainty incorporated beam angle optimization for IMPT treatment planning.
Cao W; Lim GJ; Lee A; Li Y; Liu W; Ronald Zhu X; Zhang X
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5248-56. PubMed ID: 22894449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of fixed-jaw IMRT and tangential partial-VMAT radiotherapy plans for synchronous bilateral breast cancer irradiation based on a dosimetric study.
Huang JH; Wu XX; Lin X; Shi JT; Ma YJ; Duan S; Huang XB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 20(9):31-41. PubMed ID: 31483573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Algorithm and performance of a clinical IMRT beam-angle optimization system.
Djajaputra D; Wu Q; Wu Y; Mohan R
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Oct; 48(19):3191-212. PubMed ID: 14579860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. TBS-BAO: fully automated beam angle optimization for IMRT guided by a total-beam-space reference plan.
Schipaanboord BWK; Heijmen BJM; Breedveld S
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Jan; 67(3):. PubMed ID: 35026742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric study of beam angle optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning.
Shukla AK; Kumar S; Sandhu IS; Oinam AS; Singh R; Kapoor R
J Cancer Res Ther; 2016; 12(2):1045-9. PubMed ID: 27461696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tree-based exploration of the optimization objectives for automatic cervical cancer IMRT treatment planning.
Wang H; Wang R; Liu J; Zhang J; Yao K; Yue H; Zhang Y; You J; Wu H
Br J Radiol; 2021 Jul; 94(1123):20210214. PubMed ID: 34111955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated planning of whole breast irradiation using hybrid IMRT improves efficiency and quality.
Guo B; Shah C; Xia P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 20(12):87-96. PubMed ID: 31743598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric comparison of manual and beam angle optimization of gantry angles in IMRT.
Srivastava SP; Das IJ; Kumar A; Johnstone PA
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 20817436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Dosimetric evaluation of intensity-modulated tangential beam versus conventional tangential irradiation for breast cancer].
Huang XB; Jiang GL; Chen JY; Chen LF; Hu WG
Ai Zheng; 2006 Jul; 25(7):855-60. PubMed ID: 16831277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Normal lung sparing Tomotherapy technique in stage III lung cancer.
Hong CS; Ju SG; Ahn YC; Yoo GS; Noh JM; Oh D; Chung K; Pyo H; Jo K
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):167. PubMed ID: 29110732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Dosimetric analysis of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy for patients undergone breast-conserving operation].
Sun HT; Yang RJ; Jiang P; Jiang WJ; Li JN; Meng N; Wang JJ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Feb; 50(1):188-192. PubMed ID: 29483745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric Evaluation of Different Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques for Breast Cancer After Conservative Surgery.
Zhang F; Wang Y; Xu W; Jiang H; Liu Q; Gao J; Yao B; Hou J; He H
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 14(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 25311257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fully automated treatment planning for MLC-based robotic radiotherapy.
Schipaanboord BWK; Giżyńska MK; Rossi L; de Vries KC; Heijmen BJM; Breedveld S
Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4139-4147. PubMed ID: 34037258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
