159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38095670)
1. The clinical acceptability of short versus long duration acquisitions for head and neck cancer using long-axial field-of-view PET/CT: a retrospective evaluation.
Mei R; Pyka T; Sari H; Fanti S; Afshar-Oromieh A; Giger R; Caobelli F; Rominger A; Alberts I
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2024 Apr; 51(5):1436-1443. PubMed ID: 38095670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical performance of long axial field of view PET/CT: a head-to-head intra-individual comparison of the Biograph Vision Quadra with the Biograph Vision PET/CT.
Alberts I; Hünermund JN; Prenosil G; Mingels C; Bohn KP; Viscione M; Sari H; Vollnberg B; Shi K; Afshar-Oromieh A; Rominger A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jul; 48(8):2395-2404. PubMed ID: 33797596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. FDG imaging with long-axial field-of-view PET/CT in patients with high blood glucose-a matched pair analysis.
Mingels C; Weissenrieder L; Zeimpekis K; Sari H; Nardo L; Caobelli F; Alberts I; Rominger A; Pyka T
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2024 Jun; 51(7):2036-2046. PubMed ID: 38383743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of the long axial field-of-view PET/CT with low-dose [
Sachpekidis C; Pan L; Kopp-Schneider A; Weru V; Hassel JC; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Mar; 50(4):1158-1167. PubMed ID: 36474125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility of late acquisition [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT using a long axial field-of-view PET/CT scanner for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer-first clinical experiences.
Alberts I; Prenosil G; Mingels C; Bohn KP; Viscione M; Sari H; Rominger A; Afshar-Oromieh A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Dec; 48(13):4456-4462. PubMed ID: 34155538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients.
Hahn S; Hecktor J; Grabellus F; Hartung V; Pöppel T; Kimmig R; Forsting M; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):518-23. PubMed ID: 22547387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long Versus Short Axial Field of View Immuno-PET/CT: Semiquantitative Evaluation for
Mohr P; van Sluis J; Providência L; van Snick JH; Lub-de Hooge MN; Willemsen AT; Glaudemans AWJM; Boellaard R; Lammertsma AA; Brouwers AH; Tsoumpas C
J Nucl Med; 2023 Nov; 64(11):1815-1820. PubMed ID: 37536740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital PET/CT allows for shorter acquisition protocols or reduced radiopharmaceutical dose in [
Alberts I; Sachpekidis C; Prenosil G; Viscione M; Bohn KP; Mingels C; Shi K; Ashar-Oromieh A; Rominger A
Ann Nucl Med; 2021 Apr; 35(4):485-492. PubMed ID: 33550515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Response evaluation of cervical lymph nodes after chemoradiation in patients with head and neck cancer - does additional [18F]FDG-PET-CT help?
Dejaco D; Uprimny C; Widmann G; Riedl D; Moser P; Arnold C; Steinbichler TB; Kofler B; Schartinger VH; Virgolini I; Riechelmann H
Cancer Imaging; 2020 Sep; 20(1):69. PubMed ID: 32993805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incremental Value of a Dedicated Head and Neck Acquisition during 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.
Ciappuccini R; Aide N; Blanchard D; Rame JP; de Raucourt D; Michels JJ; Babin E; Bardet S
PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162482. PubMed ID: 27598385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging vs. FDG-PET for the detection of non-small-cell lung cancer. How do they measure up?
Chen W; Jian W; Li HT; Li C; Zhang YK; Xie B; Zhou DQ; Dai YM; Lin Y; Lu M; Huang XQ; Xu CX; Chen L
Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 28(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 20418042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility of using abbreviated scan protocols with population-based input functions for accurate kinetic modeling of [
Sari H; Eriksson L; Mingels C; Alberts I; Casey ME; Afshar-Oromieh A; Conti M; Cumming P; Shi K; Rominger A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Jan; 50(2):257-265. PubMed ID: 36192468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT with optimal cut-offs of maximum standardized uptake value according to size for diagnosis of regional lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer.
Bae SU; Won KS; Song BI; Jeong WK; Baek SK; Kim HW
Cancer Imaging; 2018 Sep; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 30217167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Walk-through flat panel total-body PET: a patient-centered design for high throughput imaging at lower cost using DOI-capable high-resolution monolithic detectors.
Vandenberghe S; Muller FM; Withofs N; Dadgar M; Maebe J; Vervenne B; Akl MA; Xue S; Shi K; Sportelli G; Belcari N; Hustinx R; Vanhove C; Karp JS
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Oct; 50(12):3558-3571. PubMed ID: 37466650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of FDG PET/CT and MRI in lymph node staging of endometrial cancer.
Kim HJ; Cho A; Yun M; Kim YT; Kang WJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 26546334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What Is the Comparative Ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MDP Skeletal Scintigraphy, and Whole-body MRI as a Staging Investigation to Detect Skeletal Metastases in Patients with Osteosarcoma and Ewing Sarcoma?
Aryal A; Kumar VS; Shamim SA; Gamanagatti S; Khan SA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Aug; 479(8):1768-1779. PubMed ID: 33635285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Head-to-Head Evaluation of
Ulaner GA; Jhaveri K; Chandarlapaty S; Hatzoglou V; Riedl CC; Lewis JS; Mauguen A
J Nucl Med; 2021 Mar; 62(3):326-331. PubMed ID: 32680923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing the neck after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for Locoregional advanced head and neck cancer.
Ong SC; Schöder H; Lee NY; Patel SG; Carlson D; Fury M; Pfister DG; Shah JP; Larson SM; Kraus DH
J Nucl Med; 2008 Apr; 49(4):532-40. PubMed ID: 18344440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic performance of
Ishiguchi H; Ito S; Kato K; Sakurai Y; Kawai H; Fujita N; Abe S; Narita A; Nishio N; Muramatsu H; Takahashi Y; Naganawa S
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jun; 32(5):348-362. PubMed ID: 29667143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
