146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38300115)
1. Comparison of Lung-RADS Version 1.1 and Lung-RADS Version 2022 in Classifying Airway Nodules Detected at Lung Cancer Screening CT.
DeSimone AK; Byrne SC; Hammer MM
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging; 2024 Feb; 6(1):e230149. PubMed ID: 38300115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strategies for Reducing False-Positive Screening Results for Intermediate-Size Nodules Evaluated Using Lung-RADS: A Secondary Analysis of National Lung Screening Trial Data.
Hammer MM; Hunsaker AR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 35319912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Lung-RADS Version 1.0 versus Lung-RADS Version 1.1: Comparison of Categories Using Nodules from the National Lung Screening Trial.
Kastner J; Hossain R; Jeudy J; Dako F; Mehta V; Dalal S; Dharaiya E; White C
Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):199-206. PubMed ID: 33944631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cancer Risk in Nodules Detected at Follow-Up Lung Cancer Screening CT.
Hammer MM; Byrne SC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Apr; 218(4):634-641. PubMed ID: 34755524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of the Vancouver Risk Calculator Compared with Lung-RADS in an Urban, Diverse Clinical Lung Cancer Screening Cohort.
Kessler A; Peng R; Mardakhaev E; Haramati LB; White CS
Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2020 Mar; 2(2):e190021. PubMed ID: 33778703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Malignant Nodules Detected on Lung Cancer Screening CT: Yield of Short-Term Follow-Up CT in Showing Nodule Growth.
Byrne SC; Hammer MM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Nov; 219(5):735-741. PubMed ID: 35674352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Malignancy risk estimation of screen-detected nodules at baseline CT: comparison of the PanCan model, Lung-RADS and NCCN guidelines.
van Riel SJ; Ciompi F; Jacobs C; Winkler Wille MM; Scholten ET; Naqibullah M; Lam S; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop C; van Ginneken B
Eur Radiol; 2017 Oct; 27(10):4019-4029. PubMed ID: 28293773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rate of benign nodule resection in a lung cancer screening program.
El Alam R; Byrne SC; Hammer MM
Clin Imaging; 2023 Dec; 104():109984. PubMed ID: 37832324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lung-RADS Category 3 and 4 Nodules on Lung Cancer Screening in Clinical Practice.
Mendoza DP; Petranovic M; Som A; Wu MY; Park EY; Zhang EW; Archer JM; McDermott S; Khandekar M; Lanuti M; Gainor JF; Lennes IT; Shepard JO; Digumarthy SR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jul; 219(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 35080453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cancer Risk in Subsolid Nodules in the National Lung Screening Trial.
Hammer MM; Palazzo LL; Kong CY; Hunsaker AR
Radiology; 2019 Nov; 293(2):441-448. PubMed ID: 31526256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of Ultrashort Echo Time Pulmonary MRI for Lung Nodule Detection and Lung-RADS Classification.
Ohno Y; Takenaka D; Yoshikawa T; Yui M; Koyama H; Yamamoto K; Hamabuchi N; Shigemura C; Watanabe A; Ueda T; Ikeda H; Hattori H; Murayama K; Toyama H
Radiology; 2022 Mar; 302(3):697-706. PubMed ID: 34846203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Comparison of the PanCan Model and Lung-RADS to Assess Cancer Probability Among People With Screening-Detected, Solid Lung Nodules.
Sundaram V; Gould MK; Nair VS
Chest; 2021 Mar; 159(3):1273-1282. PubMed ID: 33393476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterizing Lung-RADS category 4 lesions in a university lung cancer screening program.
Kocher Wulfeck M; Plesner S; Herndon JE; Christensen JD; Patz EF
Lung Cancer; 2023 Dec; 186():107420. PubMed ID: 37956610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interobserver variability in Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System categorisation in subsolid nodule-enriched lung cancer screening CTs.
Yoon SH; Kim YJ; Doh K; Kim J; Lee KH; Lee KW; Kim J
Eur Radiol; 2021 Sep; 31(9):7184-7191. PubMed ID: 33733688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interpreting Lung Cancer Screening CTs: Practical Approach to Lung Cancer Screening and Application of Lung-RADS.
Jhala K; Byrne SC; Hammer MM
Clin Chest Med; 2024 Jun; 45(2):279-293. PubMed ID: 38816088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lung cancer screening by nodule volume in Lung-RADS v1.1: negative baseline CT yields potential for increased screening interval.
Silva M; Milanese G; Sestini S; Sabia F; Jacobs C; van Ginneken B; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Marchianò A; Sverzellati N; Pastorino U
Eur Radiol; 2021 Apr; 31(4):1956-1968. PubMed ID: 32997182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ACR Lung-RADS v2022: Assessment Categories and Management Recommendations.
Christensen J; Prosper AE; Wu CC; Chung J; Lee E; Elicker B; Hunsaker AR; Petranovic M; Sandler KL; Stiles B; Mazzone P; Yankelevitz D; Aberle D; Chiles C; Kazerooni E
Chest; 2024 Mar; 165(3):738-753. PubMed ID: 38300206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of Lung-Screening Reporting and Data System Versus Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer Nodule Risk Calculation in the Alberta Lung Cancer Screening Study.
Tremblay A; Taghizadeh N; MacGregor JH; Armstrong G; Bristow MS; Guo LLQ; Lydell C; Pereira R; Lee A; Elliot T; MacEachern P; Graham A; Dickinson JA; Koetzler R; Lam SC; Yang H; Bédard EL; Tammemagi M; Burrowes P
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Oct; 16(10):1425-1432. PubMed ID: 31103442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of ACR Lung-RADS in a clinical CT lung screening program.
McKee BJ; Regis SM; McKee AB; Flacke S; Wald C
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Mar; 12(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 25176499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison Between Radiological Semantic Features and Lung-RADS in Predicting Malignancy of Screen-Detected Lung Nodules in the National Lung Screening Trial.
Li Q; Balagurunathan Y; Liu Y; Qi J; Schabath MB; Ye Z; Gillies RJ
Clin Lung Cancer; 2018 Mar; 19(2):148-156.e3. PubMed ID: 29137847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
