21 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38608782)
1. The evolving Gleason grading system.
Chen N; Zhou Q
Chin J Cancer Res; 2016 Feb; 28(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 27041927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimization of the 2014 Gleason grade grouping in a Canadian cohort of patients with localized prostate cancer.
Wissing M; Brimo F; Chevalier S; Scarlata E; McKercher G; O'Flaherty A; Aprikian S; Thibodeau V; Saad F; Carmel M; Lacombe L; Têtu B; Ekindi-Ndongo N; Latour M; Trudel D; Aprikian A
BJU Int; 2019 Apr; 123(4):624-631. PubMed ID: 30113732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up.
Grogan J; Gupta R; Mahon KL; Stricker PD; Haynes AM; Delprado W; Turner J; Horvath LG; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):651-658. PubMed ID: 28371244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Alternative prostate cancer grading systems incorporating percent pattern 4/5 (IQ-Gleason) and cribriform architecture (cGrade) improve prediction of outcome after radical prostatectomy.
Seyrek N; Hollemans E; Andrinopoulou ER; Osanto S; Pelger RCM; van der Poel HG; Bekers E; Remmers S; Schoots IG; van Leenders GJLH
Virchows Arch; 2022 Jun; 480(6):1149-1157. PubMed ID: 35157140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The New Prostate Cancer Grading System Does Not Improve Prediction of Clinical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Results of a Large, Two-Center Validation Study.
Dell'Oglio P; Karnes RJ; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Stabile A; Moschini M; Cucchiara V; Zaffuto E; Karakiewicz PI; Suardi N; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Prostate; 2017 Feb; 77(3):263-273. PubMed ID: 27753114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the 2015 Gleason Grade Groups in a Nationwide Population-based Cohort.
Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Robinson D; Lissbrant IF; Egevad L; Stattin P
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1135-41. PubMed ID: 26707871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading: proposed recommendations for international implementation.
Srigley JR; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Billis A; Cheng L; Clouston D; Evans A; Furusato B; Kench J; Leite K; MacLennan G; Moch H; Pan CC; Rioux-Leclercq N; Ro J; Shanks J; Shen S; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Wheeler T; Yaxley J; Egevad L
Pathology; 2019 Aug; 51(5):463-473. PubMed ID: 31279442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long term evaluation of optimized Gleason grading in a large cohort of men with prostate cancer in Canada.
Wissing M; Brimo F; McKercher G; Scarlata E; Saad F; Carmel M; Lacombe L; Têtu B; Ekindi-Ndongo N; Latour M; Trudel D; Chevalier S; Aprikian A
Hum Pathol; 2024 Apr; 146():66-74. PubMed ID: 38608782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
