148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1000457)
1. Clindamycin plus gentamicin as expectant therapy for presumed mixed infections.
Chow AW; Ota JK; Guze LB
Can Med Assoc J; 1976 Dec; 115(12):1225-9. PubMed ID: 1000457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clindamycin and gentamicin for aerobic and anaerobic sepsis.
Fass RJ; Ruiz DE; Gardner WG; Rotilie CA
Arch Intern Med; 1977 Jan; 137(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 318824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gentamicin therapy administered by intermittent intravenous injections.
Korner B
Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B Microbiol Immunol; 1973; ():Suppl 241:15-2. PubMed ID: 4521603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of piperacillin and clindamycin plus gentamicin in women with pelvic infections.
Gunning JE
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1986 Aug; 163(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 3526592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of dactimicin plus clindamycin compared with gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of experimental intra-abdominal infections in rats.
Nord CE; Lahnborg G
Drugs Exp Clin Res; 1990; 16(8):403-6. PubMed ID: 2097144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Human intestinal tissue antibiotic concentrations. Clindamycin, gentamicin, and mezlocillin.
Thadepalli H; Lou MA; Prabhala RH; Mandal AK
Am Surg; 1990 Nov; 56(11):655-8. PubMed ID: 2240854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized controlled trial of ampicillin plus sulbactam vs. gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of intraabdominal infections: a preliminary report. Study Group of Intraabdominal Infections.
Rev Infect Dis; 1986; 8 Suppl 5():S583-8. PubMed ID: 2879345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clindamycin phosphate in severe infections mainly caused by Bacteroides fragilis: clinical and microbiological evaluation.
Schoutens E; Van Beers D; Yourassowsky E
Infection; 1974; 2(2):59-63. PubMed ID: 4367028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ciprofloxacin versus gentamicin/clindamycin for postpartum endometritis.
Maccato ML; Faro S; Martens MG; Hammill HA
J Reprod Med; 1991 Dec; 36(12):857-61. PubMed ID: 1816396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Empiric treatment with clindamycin and gentamicin of suspected sepsis due to anaerobic and aerobic bacteria.
Bartlett JG; Miao PV; Gorbach SL
J Infect Dis; 1977 Mar; 135 Suppl():S80-5. PubMed ID: 850096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ciprofloxacin monotherapy for acute pelvic infections: a comparison with clindamycin plus gentamicin.
Thadepalli H; Mathai D; Scotti R; Bansal MB; Savage E
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Oct; 78(4):696-702. PubMed ID: 1923175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Presumptive antibiotics for penetrating abdominal wounds.
Moore FA; Moore EE; Ammons LA; McCroskey BL
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Aug; 169(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 2667180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of prophylactic antibiotics upon mixed infections with Bacteroides fragilis.
Brook I
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Dec; 165(6):491-5. PubMed ID: 3317944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative efficacy of cefoperazone, cefoperazone plus sulbactam, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, metronidazole, and penicillin G against anaerobic bacteria in an animal model.
Moody JA; Fasching CE; Sinn LM; Gerding DN; Peterson LR
J Lab Clin Med; 1990 Feb; 115(2):190-5. PubMed ID: 1967626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cefoxitin versus clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of postcesarean section infections.
Herman G; Cohen AW; Talbot GH; Coghlan R; Faidley-Mangen P; MacGregor RR
Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Mar; 67(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 3511419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized controlled trial of moxalactam versus clindamycin/tobramycin in the treatment of mixed anaerobic/aerobic infections.
Joshi M; Fitzpatrick BJ; Warren JW; Caplan ES; Tenney JH
Am Surg; 1986 Sep; 52(9):467-71. PubMed ID: 3530075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment of mixed bacterial infections with clindamycin and gentamicin.
Fass RJ
J Infect Dis; 1977 Mar; 135 Suppl():S74-9. PubMed ID: 403243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of two comparative antibiotic regimens in the treatment of serious intra-abdominal infections: results of a multicenter study.
Eckhauser FE; Knol JA; Raper SE; Mulholland MW; Helzerman P
Clin Ther; 1992; 14(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 1576632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized, double-blind comparison of sulbactam/ampicillin and clindamycin for the treatment of aerobic and aerobic-anaerobic infections.
Reinhardt JF; Johnston L; Ruane P; Johnson CC; Ingram-drake L; MacDonald K; Ward KW; Mathisen G; George WL; Finegold SM
Rev Infect Dis; 1986; 8 Suppl 5():S569-75. PubMed ID: 3026005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective randomized study of moxalactam versus gentamicin and clindamycin in penetrating abdominal trauma.
Kreis DJ; Augenstein D; Martinez O; Echenique M; Plasencia G; Vopal JJ; Byers P; Gomez GA
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1986 Jul; 163(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 3726718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
