BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1000898)

  • 1. The radiology of the intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Mayall EM; Mayall GF
    Clin Radiol; 1976 Oct; 27(4):541-3. PubMed ID: 1000898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. II. Diagnostic methods, prevention, and management.
    Zakin D; Stern WZ; Rosenblatt R
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1981 Aug; 36(8):401-17. PubMed ID: 6455610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perforation of the uterus by the copper-t and copper-7 intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Cederqvist LL; Lindhe BA; Fuchs F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1975; 54(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 1169868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Management of the lost IUD.
    Otolorin EO
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 1985; 14(3-4):125-9. PubMed ID: 3004172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Management of translocated and incarcerated intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Mittal S; Gupta I; Lata P; Mahajan U; Gupta AN
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Aug; 26(3):232-4. PubMed ID: 3468943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy of material adherent to intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Sheppard BL; Bonnar J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1980 Feb; 87(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 7362803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Immediate postplacental insertion of GYNE-T 380 and GYNE-T 380 postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices: randomized study.
    Tatum HJ; Beltran RS; Ramos R; Van Kets H; Sivin I; Schmidt FH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Nov; 175(5):1231-5. PubMed ID: 8942493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The missing forgotten intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Gruber A; Rabinerson D; Kaplan B; Pardo J; Neri A
    Contraception; 1996 Aug; 54(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 8842589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Perforation of the uterus with a Lippe's loop].
    Jacobsen KU
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1973 Mar; 135(13):702-3. PubMed ID: 4737089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perforations of uterus by intrauterine device.
    Chakrabarty B; Mondal SK
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 1968 Apr; 18(2):262-4. PubMed ID: 12331816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Molding of the uterus following intrauterine contraceptive device removal: documentation by hysterosalpingography.
    Viglione CA; Cuttino JT; Clark RL
    Urol Radiol; 1987; 9(3):188-90. PubMed ID: 3438967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chlamydial serologic characteristics among intrauterine contraceptive device users: does copper inhibit chlamydial infection in the female genital tract?
    Mehanna MT; Rizk MA; Ramadan M; Schachter J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Sep; 171(3):691-3. PubMed ID: 8092216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic removal of translocated intrauterine contraceptives devices.
    McKenna PJ; Mylotte MJ
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Feb; 89(2):163-5. PubMed ID: 6461352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Some adverse effects of copper-IUD.
    Cullberg G; Larsson B
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1979; 58(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 419962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statement on intrauterine devices (IUDs).
    International Planned Parenthood Federation IPPF. International Medical Advisory Panel IMAP
    IPPF Med Bull; 1987 Dec; 21(6):3-5. PubMed ID: 12268853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simple technic of hysterography for evaluating side effects and mode of action of intrauterine devices. A study of 100 cases.
    Mazher K; Kamal I; Hefnawi F; Talaat M; Younis N; Tagi AE
    Fertil Steril; 1967; 18(3):353-66. PubMed ID: 6024079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface changes in intrauterine contraceptive devices after variable use.
    Keith L; Bailey R; Berger GS; Method M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 May; 152(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 3993713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Some observations on intrauterine contraceptive device (Lippes loop).
    Menon MK
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 1970 Jun; 20(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 12275251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metallic copper as an intrauterine contraceptice adjunct to the "T" device.
    Zipper JA; Tatum HJ; Pastene L; Medel M; Rivera M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1969 Dec; 105(8):1274-8. PubMed ID: 5360257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.