157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1000906)
1. Analysis of mathematical models used in data extrapolation.
Jones HB; Grendon A
Clin Toxicol; 1976; 9(5):791-7. PubMed ID: 1000906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Approaches to the risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens in food: a critical appraisal.
O'Brien J; Renwick AG; Constable A; Dybing E; Müller DJ; Schlatter J; Slob W; Tueting W; van Benthem J; Williams GM; Wolfreys A
Food Chem Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 44(10):1613-35. PubMed ID: 16887251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [On the problem of permissible doses of substances presenting carcinogenic hazards].
Neĭman IM
Vopr Pitan; 1967; 26(3):3-7. PubMed ID: 5611456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the carcinogenicity and mutagenicity of chemicals. Report of a WHO Scientific Group.
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser; 1974; 546(0):1-19. PubMed ID: 4214379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Principles of risk assessment for determining the safety of chemicals: recent assessment of residual solvents in drugs and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.
Hasegawa R; Koizumi M; Hirose A
Congenit Anom (Kyoto); 2004 Jun; 44(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 15198717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extrapolation of animal studies to the human situation.
Zapp JA
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1977 Jul; 2(6):1425-33. PubMed ID: 886632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of food safety.
Doull J
Fed Proc; 1978 Oct; 37(12):2594-7. PubMed ID: 700168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Future role of epidemiology in food safety evaluation.
Higginson J
Clin Toxicol; 1976; 9(5):691-708. PubMed ID: 1000903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The assessment of low-dose carcinogenicity.
Armitage P
Biometrics; 1982 Mar; 38 Suppl():119-39. PubMed ID: 7046818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationships between laboratory and human studies.
Clayson DB
J Environ Pathol Toxicol; 1977; 1(2):31-40. PubMed ID: 553139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multistage models and primary prevention of cancer.
Day NE; Brown CC
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1980 Apr; 64(4):977-89. PubMed ID: 6929006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Re-examination of the ED01 study - adjusting for time on study.
Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1981; 1(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 7184775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uncertainty estimates for low-dose-rate extrapolations of animal carcinogenicity data.
Guess H; Crump K; Peto R
Cancer Res; 1977 Oct; 37(10):3475-83. PubMed ID: 908002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between dose and health effects.
Kimbrough RD
Clin Lab Med; 1984 Sep; 4(3):507-19. PubMed ID: 6383696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pathology: studies of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity.
Newberne PM
J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1975 Jul; 58(4):650-6. PubMed ID: 1150603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Carcinogenic risk assessment--the consequences of believing models.
Crouch EA
Basic Life Sci; 1983; 24():653-65. PubMed ID: 6860280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Trichloroethylene cancer risk: simplified calculation of PBPK-based MCLs for cytotoxic end points.
Bogen KT; Gold LS
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Feb; 25(1):26-42. PubMed ID: 9056499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Methods of risk assessment from data of experimental carcinogenesis studies].
Roller M; Csicsaky M; Pott F
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1992 Mar; 192(6):479-93. PubMed ID: 1315551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fundamental carcinogenic processes and their implications for low dose risk assessment.
Crump KS; Hoel DG; Langley CH; Peto R
Cancer Res; 1976 Sep; 36(9 pt.1):2973-9. PubMed ID: 975067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Patterns of the dose-effect dependence of chemical carcinogens].
Katul'skiĭ IuN
Vopr Onkol; 1983; 29(6):93-100. PubMed ID: 6868483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
