These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10022179)

  • 1. The craniofacial morphology of bruxers versus nonbruxers.
    Young DV; Rinchuse DJ; Pierce CJ; Zullo T
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 10022179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The dentofacial morphology of bruxers versus non-bruxers.
    Menapace SE; Rinchuse DJ; Zullo T; Pierce CJ; Shnorhokian H
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 8172394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The anthropomorphic proportions of the face: an evaluation of the response to orthodontic surgical treatment of Angle class III].
    Savastano C; Craca R
    Minerva Stomatol; 1992 Sep; 41(9):373-83. PubMed ID: 1491654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Craniofacial morphology in orthodontically treated patients of class III malocclusion with stable and unstable treatment outcomes.
    Tahmina K; Tanaka E; Tanne K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 10842111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agreement between cranial and facial classification through clinical observation and anthropometric measurement among Envigado school children.
    Torres-Restrepo AM; Quintero-Monsalve AM; Giraldo-Mira JF; Rueda ZV; Vélez-Trujillo N; Botero-Mariaca P
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 May; 14():50. PubMed ID: 24886038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lack of associations between occlusal and cephalometric measures, side imbalance in striatal D2 receptor binding, and sleep-related oromotor activities.
    Lobbezoo F; Rompré PH; Soucy JP; Iafrancesco C; Turkewicz J; Montplaisir JY; Lavigne GJ
    J Orofac Pain; 2001; 15(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 11889650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dimensional differences in the craniofacial morphologies of groups with deep and shallow mandibular antegonial notching.
    Lambrechts AH; Harris AM; Rossouw PE; Stander I
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 8863961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Craniofacial parameters during growth from the deciduous to permanent dentition--a longitudinal study.
    Gazi-Coklica V; Muretić Z; Brcić R; Kern J; Milicić A
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Dec; 19(6):681-9. PubMed ID: 9458601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proportion indices in the craniofacial regions of 284 healthy North American white children between 1 and 5 years of age.
    Farkas LG; Hreczko TM; Katic MJ; Forrest CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Jan; 14(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 12544216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship of the functional oropharynx to craniofacial morphology.
    Trenouth MJ; Timms DJ
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 10515139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Natural craniofacial changes in the third decade of life: a longitudinal study.
    Akgül AA; Toygar TU
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):512-22. PubMed ID: 12439480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional analysis system for orthognathic surgery patients with jaw deformities.
    Terajima M; Yanagita N; Ozeki K; Hoshino Y; Mori N; Goto TK; Tokumori K; Aoki Y; Nakasima A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 18617109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional anthropometric analysis of chinese faces and its application in evaluating facial deformity.
    Dong Y; Zhao Y; Bai S; Wu G; Zhou L; Wang B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 69(4):1195-206. PubMed ID: 21050632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dental erosion and bruxism. A tooth wear analysis from south east Queensland.
    Khan F; Young WG; Daley TJ
    Aust Dent J; 1998 Apr; 43(2):117-27. PubMed ID: 9612986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of some facial anthropometric parameters in an Iranian population: infancy through adolescence.
    Jahanbin A; Rashed R; Yazdani R; Shahri NM; Kianifar H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):941-5. PubMed ID: 23714916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Occlusal factors are not related to self-reported bruxism.
    Manfredini D; Visscher CM; Guarda-Nardini L; Lobbezoo F
    J Orofac Pain; 2012; 26(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 22838000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Craniofacial dimensions in twins].
    Gazi-Coklica V; Lapter V
    Bilt Udruz Ortodonata Jugosl; 1990; 23(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 2096837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The neurocranial and craniofacial morphology in children with solitary median maxillary central incisor (SMMCI).
    Tabatabaie F; Sonnesen L; Kjaer I
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 May; 11(2):96-104. PubMed ID: 18416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Craniofacial morphology and growth in the ferret: effects from alteration of masticatory function.
    He T
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2004; (165):1-72. PubMed ID: 15224640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tooth wear in young subjects: a discriminator between sleep bruxers and controls?
    Abe S; Yamaguchi T; Rompré PH; De Grandmont P; Chen YJ; Lavigne GJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):342-50. PubMed ID: 19639069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.