These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

466 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10023224)

  • 1. Fracture strength of 5 different all-ceramic crown systems.
    Strub JR; Beschnidt SM
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(6):602-9. PubMed ID: 10023224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
    Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of incisal veneering porcelain thickness of two metal ceramic crown systems on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
    Geminiani A; Lee H; Feng C; Ercoli C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):275-82. PubMed ID: 20416410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth.
    Beschnidt SM; Strub JR
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Jul; 26(7):582-93. PubMed ID: 10445478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A study on the fracture strength of implant-supported restorations using milled ceramic abutments and all-ceramic crowns.
    Cho HW; Dong JK; Jin TH; Oh SC; Lee HH; Lee JW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 11887605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
    Shirakura A; Lee H; Geminiani A; Ercoli C; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19167536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of thermomechanical fatigue loading on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic posterior crowns.
    Senyilmaz DP; Canay S; Heydecke G; Strub JR
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Jun; 18(2):50-4. PubMed ID: 20698417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of firing cycles on the margin distortion of 3 all-ceramic crown systems.
    Balkaya MC; Cinar A; Pamuk S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):346-55. PubMed ID: 15798685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Probability of fracture of all-ceramic crowns.
    Chai J; Takahashi Y; Sulaiman F; Chong K; Lautenschlager EP
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(5):420-4. PubMed ID: 11203665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
    Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors.
    Zhi-Yue L; Yu-Xing Z
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 12690349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.
    Vult von Steyern P
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (173):1-69. PubMed ID: 16001730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance of aluminium oxide and lithium disilicate-based crowns using different luting cements: an in vitro study.
    Al-Wahadni AM; Hussey DL; Grey N; Hatamleh MM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Mar; 10(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 19279972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Material characteristics of a novel shrinkage-free ZrSiO(4) ceramic for the fabrication of posterior crowns.
    Heydecke G; Butz F; Binder JR; Strub JR
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jul; 23(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 16949145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compressive strength of two modern all-ceramic crowns.
    Pröbster L
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(5):409-14. PubMed ID: 1290569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: an in vitro study.
    Att W; Kurun S; Gerds T; Strub JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 16473084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resistance to fracture of two all-ceramic crown materials following endodontic access.
    Wood KC; Berzins DW; Luo Q; Thompson GA; Toth JM; Nagy WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jan; 95(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 16399273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns.
    Sulaiman F; Chai J; Jameson LM; Wozniak WT
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(5):478-84. PubMed ID: 9495168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tolerance test of five different types of crowns on single-tooth implants.
    Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Rasmusson L
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 9728117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigation of the dry and wet fatigue properties of three all-ceramic crown systems.
    Sobrinho LC; Cattell MJ; Glover RH; Knowles JC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 9728120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.