These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10025112)

  • 1. [Basic and clinical aspects of modern perimetry].
    Otori T
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Dec; 102(12):779-95. PubMed ID: 10025112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of manual Goldmann and automated static visual fields using the Dicon 2000 perimeter in the detection of chiasmal tumors.
    Wirtschafter JD; Coffman SM
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1984 Aug; 16(8):733-41. PubMed ID: 6497219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Automated flicker perimetry].
    Lachenmayr B; Gleissner M; Rothbächer H
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1989; 86(6):695-701. PubMed ID: 2625301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated combined kinetic and static perimetry: an alternative to standard perimetry in patients with neuro-ophthalmic disease and glaucoma.
    Pineles SL; Volpe NJ; Miller-Ellis E; Galetta SL; Sankar PS; Shindler KS; Maguire MG
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 124(3):363-9. PubMed ID: 16534056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation of visual evoked potentials and static perimetry in chiasmal tumors and retrobulbar neuritis].
    Sobolewski P
    Klin Oczna; 1993 Jun; 95(6):223-6. PubMed ID: 8309191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Flicker perimetry (CFF) in glaucoma diagnosis].
    Dudziński A; Zawojska I; Kinasz R
    Klin Oczna; 2003; 105(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 14746180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of functional visual field loss by automated static perimetry.
    Frisén L
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 92(8):805-9. PubMed ID: 24698019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Flicker perimetry (CFF) in patients with lens opacities--first report].
    Kinasz R; Zawojska I; Dudziński A; Wygledowska-Promieńska D
    Klin Oczna; 2005; 107(1-3):31-5. PubMed ID: 16052795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.
    Matsumoto C; Takada S; Okuyama S; Arimura E; Hashimoto S; Shimomura Y
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of a new static perimetric thresholding strategy (GATE).
    Luithardt AF; Meisner C; Monhart M; Krapp E; Mast A; Schiefer U
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 99(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 25053761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Automated and semiautomated perimetry. Comparative trial of 3 devices (Baylor programmer, Friedmann Mark II campimeter, Octopus 2000 R.)].
    Pradines F; Delbosc B; Royer J
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1985; 8(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 3891833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Suprathreshold static perimetry. Initial clinical trials with the Fieldmaster automated perimeter.
    Keltner JL; Johnson CA; Balestrery FG
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1979 Feb; 97(2):260-72. PubMed ID: 399178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Macular diseases--application of automated static perimetry and optical coherence tomography].
    Iijima H
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2000 Dec; 104(12):943-59. PubMed ID: 11193945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency-doubling threshold perimetry in predicting glaucoma in a population-based study: The Beijing Eye Study.
    Wang YX; Xu L; Zhang RX; Jonas JB
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 125(10):1402-6. PubMed ID: 17923550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Computer program controlled perimetry, its advantages and disadvantages].
    Herbolzheimer WG
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1986 Oct; 189(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 3807218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of SKP (semi-automated kinetic perimetry) and SASP (suprathreshold automated static perimetry) techniques in patients with advanced glaucoma].
    Nowomiejska K; Paetzold J; Krapp E; Rejdak R; Zagórski Z; Schiefer U
    Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):231-3. PubMed ID: 15510509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency doubling perimetry in resolved optic neuritis.
    Fujimoto N; Adachi-Usami E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Aug; 41(9):2558-60. PubMed ID: 10937566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [First experience with the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter® on patients with ocular hypertension and preperimetric glaucoma].
    Hasler S; Stürmer J
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Apr; 229(4):319-22. PubMed ID: 22495996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.