188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10025314)
1. The Health Care Complaints Commission and nurses.
Cohen S
Lamp; 1998 Mar; 55(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 10025314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer reviews. Expert opinions and unsatisfactory professional conduct.
Taylor K
Lamp; 1998 Aug; 55(7):19. PubMed ID: 10025358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Facing a competence review.
Cook P
Nurs N Z; 2009 Sep; 15(8):26. PubMed ID: 19891142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Legal issues for nurses. Navigating the Board of Nurse Examiner's disciplinary process.
Becker PA
Tex Nurs; 1996; 70(6):13-4. PubMed ID: 8932254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating neurosurgical testimony by non-neurosurgeons: case studies.
Watts C
Surg Neurol; 2009 Apr; 71(4):510-1. PubMed ID: 18482763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The expert medical witness.
Roberts DK
J Kans Med Soc; 1984 Dec; 85(12):335-6, 339. PubMed ID: 6520535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. To review or not to review: antitrust liabilities and peer review protections.
Acevedo LJ
J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Nov; 27(11):321-36, 351-2. PubMed ID: 10138598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Professional conduct review process.
Nurs BC; 2007 Apr; 39(2):11-5. PubMed ID: 17477183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Common knowledge in medical malpractice litigation: a diagnosis and prescription.
Dahlquist R
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1984 May; 6(3):7-31. PubMed ID: 10266303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Medico-legal evaluation of unfavorable outcomes in medical practice].
Gromov AP
Sov Med; 1990; (7):3-11. PubMed ID: 2251559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Friend of the court.
Tex Med; 1997 Jul; 93(7):24-6. PubMed ID: 9226986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Criminal prosecution of health care providers for clinical mistakes and fatal errors: is "bad medicine" a crime?
Van Grunsven PR
J Health Hosp Law; 1996; 29(2):107-20. PubMed ID: 10160174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. KY: unlicensed nurse expert's testimony excluded: selecting 'wrong expert' can be fatal to case.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Apr; 43(11):3. PubMed ID: 12764979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Deplorable nursing care: one year license "revocation" upheld.
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1997 Nov; 38(6):4. PubMed ID: 9444232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ninth Circuit clarifies immunity requirements and puts more teeth into the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
Fogel PD; Phillips EJ
J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Nov; 27(11):337-40, 352. PubMed ID: 10138599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultimate doctor liability: a myth of ignorance or myth of control?
Cashin A; Carey M; Watson N; Clark G; Newman C; Waters CD
Collegian; 2009; 16(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 19831145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nurses were illegally barred from review panel. Case on point: Harlet v. St. Vincent Hospitals and Health Svcs, 2001 WL 503459 N.E.2d-IN.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2001 Jun; 42(1):4. PubMed ID: 11995401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Litigation and legislation. You can't say that.
Jerrold L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):248-9. PubMed ID: 22284294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 and the National Practitioner Data Bank: the controversy over practitioner privacy versus public access.
Heffernan M
Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1996 Apr; 84(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 8826636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Forensic medical expertise in connection with professional violations of the law by pediatricians].
Plaksin VO; Tabolin VA; Rostoshinskiĭ EN
Sud Med Ekspert; 1994; 37(2):3-5. PubMed ID: 8009550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
