169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10025358)
1. Peer reviews. Expert opinions and unsatisfactory professional conduct.
Taylor K
Lamp; 1998 Aug; 55(7):19. PubMed ID: 10025358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Health Care Complaints Commission and nurses.
Cohen S
Lamp; 1998 Mar; 55(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 10025314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Facing a competence review.
Cook P
Nurs N Z; 2009 Sep; 15(8):26. PubMed ID: 19891142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating neurosurgical testimony by non-neurosurgeons: case studies.
Watts C
Surg Neurol; 2009 Apr; 71(4):510-1. PubMed ID: 18482763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Professional conduct review process.
Nurs BC; 2007 Apr; 39(2):11-5. PubMed ID: 17477183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Friend of the court.
Tex Med; 1997 Jul; 93(7):24-6. PubMed ID: 9226986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Litigation and legislation. You can't say that.
Jerrold L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):248-9. PubMed ID: 22284294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Rationale for a medical society sponsored expert witness program.
Scarano VR
Tex Med; 1996 Dec; 92(12):80-5. PubMed ID: 8979765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. KY: unlicensed nurse expert's testimony excluded: selecting 'wrong expert' can be fatal to case.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Apr; 43(11):3. PubMed ID: 12764979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Deplorable nursing care: one year license "revocation" upheld.
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1997 Nov; 38(6):4. PubMed ID: 9444232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Nurses were illegally barred from review panel. Case on point: Harlet v. St. Vincent Hospitals and Health Svcs, 2001 WL 503459 N.E.2d-IN.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2001 Jun; 42(1):4. PubMed ID: 11995401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Legal issues for nurses. Navigating the Board of Nurse Examiner's disciplinary process.
Becker PA
Tex Nurs; 1996; 70(6):13-4. PubMed ID: 8932254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Expert medical testimony: responsibilities of medical societies.
McAbee GN
Neurology; 2005 Jul; 65(2):337; author reply 337. PubMed ID: 16043821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Patients Disciplinary Board, expert knowledge or legal rights].
Møller N; Rungby J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jun; 165(24):2501-2; author reply 2502. PubMed ID: 12872476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Liability arising out of professional disciplinary law.
Taylor K
Lamp; 1998 Jan; 55(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 9543997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Taming the expert: standards and implications of radiologist expert witness testimony.
Muroff JA; Berlin L
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 May; 2(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 17411847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Was failure to pass licensure exam admissible?
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2006 Nov; 47(6):4. PubMed ID: 17153335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. 4 nurse attorneys tell you how to stay out of legal hot water.
Roman LM
RN; 2007 Jan; 70(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 17274195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer review where it counts.
Bryan CS
J S C Med Assoc; 1989 Apr; 85(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 2709821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Natural justice.
Taylor K
Lamp; 1998 Jul; 55(6):25-6. PubMed ID: 10025351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
