These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Phase I of the Stark II final rule. Wachler AB; Avery PA Mich Health Hosp; 2001; 37(4):52-3. PubMed ID: 11467128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stark reality. How Stark I and II will impact physician relationships. Avery PA; Wachler AB Mich Health Hosp; 1995; 31(5):34-6. PubMed ID: 10151703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medicare and Medicaid programs; physicians' referrals to health care entities with which they have financial relationships. Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS. Final rule with comment period. Fed Regist; 2001 Jan; 66(3):856-965. PubMed ID: 11503745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stark II final regulations: hot issues for physician practices. Falk R; Hance A J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 20(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 15523769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physician group practice implications under the proposed Stark II regulations. Sokolow DS Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Aug; ():6-9. PubMed ID: 10661984 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Physician refer thyself: is Stark II, phase III the final voyage? Manchikanti L; McMahon EB Pain Physician; 2007 Nov; 10(6):725-41. PubMed ID: 17987094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fraud and abuse. Understanding the Stark II proposed regulations. Davis JP Healthc Financ Manage; 1998 Apr; 52(4):65-9. PubMed ID: 10178067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medicare and Medicaid programs; physicians' referrals to health care entities with which they have financial relationships--HCFA. Proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1998 Jan; 63(6):1659-728. PubMed ID: 10177062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ten myths about the Stark statute debunked. Gosfield AG J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 19(4):200-3. PubMed ID: 15018367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stark II proposed regulations. Impacting group practices and physician employers. Wachler AB; Avery PA Mich Health Hosp; 1998; 34(3):37-8. PubMed ID: 10179373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Stark truth about the Stark law: Part II. Gosfield AG Fam Pract Manag; 2004 Feb; 11(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 15011481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The new Stark rules: what does Stark II Phase III mean for healthcare providers? Hofstra PS; Bilimoria NM J Med Pract Manage; 2008; 23(5):300-3. PubMed ID: 18472609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New final Stark II regulations. Pontius CA MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 May; 33(5):14. PubMed ID: 11373811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. How the new Stark II regulations affect group practices. Larios D; Meyer A Tenn Med; 1998 Apr; 91(4):128-30. PubMed ID: 9564245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Proposed Stark II regulations unveiled. HCFA interpretation of self-referral rules recognize circumstances of dialysis providers. Riley JB; Pristave RJ Nephrol News Issues; 1998 Jun; 12(6):13-5. PubMed ID: 9697471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Finally, HCFA proposes regulations interpreting stark II. Katayama AC WMJ; 1998 Mar; 97(3):67-73. PubMed ID: 9540454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Stark II proposed regulations. More restrictions, more confusion. Commins K Mich Health Hosp; 1998; 34(3):36. PubMed ID: 10179372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]