These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10028634)

  • 1. Impact of new digital X- and gamma ray imaging systems upon patient doses.
    Speller R; Royle G; Scannavini MG; Horrocks J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1999 Jan; 50(1):153-63. PubMed ID: 10028634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Study of a prototype high quantum efficiency thick scintillation crystal video-electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2783-91. PubMed ID: 16964854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimising automatic exposure control in computed radiography and the impact on patient dose.
    Doyle P; Gentle D; Martin CJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):236-9. PubMed ID: 15933114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Balancing patient dose and image quality.
    Martin CJ; Sutton DG; Sharp PF
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1999 Jan; 50(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 10028625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation.
    Geijer H; Beckman K; Jonsson B; Andersson T; Persliden J
    Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):402-10. PubMed ID: 11161153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computed radiography as a gamma ray detector--dose response and applications.
    O'Keeffe DS; McLeod RW
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Aug; 49(16):3559-72. PubMed ID: 15446787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Segmented crystalline scintillators: an initial investigation of high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
    Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Li Y; Su Z; Wang Y; Yamamoto J; Du H; Cunningham I; Klugerman M; Shah K
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3067-83. PubMed ID: 16279059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic flat panel detector versus image intensifier in cardiac imaging: dose and image quality.
    Vano E; Geiger B; Schreiner A; Back C; Beissel J
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5731-42. PubMed ID: 16306664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation dose reduction on a portable image intensifier digital storage unit.
    Fleay RF
    Australas Radiol; 1987 Feb; 31(1):88-9. PubMed ID: 3619815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Technical parameters to decrease the radiation dose from conventional and digital radiographs].
    Foulquier JN
    J Radiol; 2010 Nov; 91(11 Pt 2):1225-30. PubMed ID: 21178896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Dependence of the sensitivity of combined intensifying film-screens on the voltage in X-ray tubes].
    Gurvich AM; Katomina RV; Lebedev LA; Stavitskiĭ RV; Kharon IuIa
    Med Tekh; 1984; (4):14-9. PubMed ID: 6482712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An analysis of dose efficiency in image intensified fluoroscopic examinations.
    Bernstein H; Muntz EP
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 7322044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory.
    Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New approach to the LSF measurement of x-ray intensifying screens.
    Geary JM
    Med Phys; 1978; 5(6):540-2. PubMed ID: 732778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reduction of patient doses from barium meal and barium enema examinations through changes in equipment factors.
    Martin CJ; Hunter S
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Dec; 67(804):1196-205. PubMed ID: 7874418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Radiation exposure of the patient exemplified by lateral cranial image in digital luminescence radiography in comparison with the film-screen system].
    Seifert H; Kubale R; Blass G; Kunz G; Wagner P; Kramann B; Leetz HK
    Rontgenpraxis; 1995 Oct; 48(10):298-303. PubMed ID: 7502166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eye dose limits and the use of overcouch and undercouch X-ray image intensifier systems.
    Palmer KE; Wright IH
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Dec; 58(696):1221-3. PubMed ID: 3842637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dose optimisation in computed radiography.
    Schreiner-Karoussou A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16461522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does digital imaging decrease patient dose? A pilot study and review of the literature.
    Neofotistou V; Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):204-10. PubMed ID: 16464833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Luminophores on a base of rare-earth element compounds for X-ray intensifying screens].
    Boev EI; Rabkin IKh; Glagoleva AA; Glagoleva MA; Korsaev VV
    Med Tekh; 1988; (3):31-6. PubMed ID: 3047518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.