These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10028641)

  • 1. Patient dosimetry activities in the United States: the nationwide evaluation of X-ray trends (NEXT) and tissue dose handbooks.
    Suleiman OH; Stern SH; Spelic DC
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1999 Jan; 50(1):247-59. PubMed ID: 10028641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reference values for diagnostic radiology: application and impact.
    Gray JE; Archer BR; Butler PF; Hobbs BB; Mettler FA; Pizzutiello RJ; Schueler BA; Strauss KJ; Suleiman OH; Yaffe MJ
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):354-8. PubMed ID: 15758190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends survey of abdomen and lumbosacral spine radiography.
    Spelic DC; Kaczmarek RV; Suleiman OH
    Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 15220497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nationwide surveys of chest, abdomen, lumbosacral spine radiography, and upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy: a summary of findings.
    Spelic DC; Kaczmarek RV; Hilohi MC; Moyal AE
    Health Phys; 2010 Mar; 98(3):498-514. PubMed ID: 20147791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nationwide survey of fluoroscopy: radiation dose and image quality.
    Suleiman OH; Conway BJ; Quinn P; Antonsen RG; Rueter FG; Slayton RJ; Spelic DC
    Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):471-6. PubMed ID: 9114107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimated skin dose look-up tables and their effect on dose awareness in the fluoroscopy-guided imaging suite.
    Dickinson RL; Zamora DA; Kanal KM; Stewart BK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):630-6. PubMed ID: 25148168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of skin entrance doses (SEDs) for common medical X-ray diagnostic examinations in India and proposed diagnostic reference levels (DRLs).
    Sonawane AU; Shirva VK; Pradhan AS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Feb; 138(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 19864328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance assessment of patient dosimetry services and X-ray quality assurance instruments used in diagnostic radiology.
    Green S; Palethorpe JE; Peach D; Bradley DA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1999 Jan; 50(1):137-52. PubMed ID: 10028633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Overview of patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology in the USA for the past 50 years.
    Huda W; Nickoloff EL; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5713-28. PubMed ID: 19175129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of spectra on calibration and measurement with mammographic ionization chambers.
    DeWerd LA; Micka JA; Laird RW; Pearson DW; O'Brien M; Lamperti P
    Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2649-54. PubMed ID: 12462732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On-line data collection platform for national dose surveys in diagnostic and interventional radiology.
    Vassileva J; Simeonov F; Avramova-Cholakova S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):121-4. PubMed ID: 25784776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. National reference doses for common radiographic, fluoroscopic and dental X-ray examinations in the UK.
    Hart D; Hillier MC; Wall BF
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):1-12. PubMed ID: 18852213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Air-Kerma Standard for Mammography X-Ray in Japan: Progress and Prospects].
    Tanaka T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2021; 41(3):87-91. PubMed ID: 34744139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimates of diagnostic reference levels for pediatric peripheral and abdominal fluoroscopically guided procedures.
    Strauss KJ; Racadio JM; Johnson N; Patel M; Nachabe RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):W713-9. PubMed ID: 26001261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic Reference Levels for conventional radiography and fluoroscopy in Austria: Results and updated National Diagnostic Reference Levels derived from a nationwide survey.
    Wachabauer D; Röthlin F; Moshammer HM; Homolka P
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():135-139. PubMed ID: 30927937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An inter-hospital comparison of patient dose based on clinical indications.
    Teeuwisse W; Geleijns J; Veldkamp W
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Jul; 17(7):1795-805. PubMed ID: 17061067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medical devices; performance standard for diagnostic x-ray systems; amendment. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Public Health Service (PHS), Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1999 Jul; 64(127):35924-8. PubMed ID: 10558580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient radiation doses in interventional cardiology in the U.S.: advisory data sets and possible initial values for U.S. reference levels.
    Miller DL; Hilohi CM; Spelic DC
    Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6276-86. PubMed ID: 23039663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of effective doses obtained from dose-area product and air kerma measurements in interventional radiology.
    Bor D; Sancak T; Olgar T; Elcim Y; Adanali A; Sanlidilek U; Akyar S
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Apr; 77(916):315-22. PubMed ID: 15107322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [National Dose Standards for X-ray Diagnostics and Calibration of Dosemeters].
    Saito N; Tanaka T; Kurosawa T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Dec; 71(12):1251-8. PubMed ID: 26685838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.