These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10028641)

  • 21. Estimating pediatric entrance skin dose from digital radiography examination using DICOM metadata: A quality assurance tool.
    Brady SL; Kaufman RA
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2489-97. PubMed ID: 25979042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Calibration of dosemeters used in mammography with different X ray qualities: EUROMET project no. 526.
    Witzani J; Bjerke H; Bochud F; Csete I; Denoziere M; de Vries W; Ennow K; Grindborg JE; Hourdakis C; Kosunen A; Kramer HM; Pernick F; Sander T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 108(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 14974603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimation of the peak entrance surface air kerma for patients undergoing computed tomography-guided procedures.
    Avilés Lucas P; Dance DR; Castellano IA; Vañó E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):317-20. PubMed ID: 15933129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Local patient dose diagnostic reference levels in pediatric interventional cardiology in Chile using age bands and patient weight values.
    Ubeda C; Miranda P; Vano E
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):615-622. PubMed ID: 28102608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Proposed diagnostic reference levels for general radiography and mammography in Japan.
    Asada Y; Kondo Y; Kobayashi M; Kobayashi K; Ichikawa T; Matsunaga Y
    J Radiol Prot; 2020 Sep; 40(3):867-876. PubMed ID: 32590370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimation of entrance surface air kerma due to diagnostic X-ray examinations of adult patients in Uttarakhand, India and establishment of local diagnostic reference levels.
    Uniyal SC; Chaturvedi V; Sharma SD; Raghuvanshi S
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2017 Sep; 40(3):687-694. PubMed ID: 28819817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of exposure standards in the mammography x-ray region.
    Coletti JG; Pearson DW; DeWerd LA; O'Brien CM; Lamperti PJ
    Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1263-7. PubMed ID: 9284250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Patient doses and dosimetric evaluations in interventional cardiology.
    Bor D; Olğar T; Toklu T; Cağlan A; Onal E; Padovani R
    Phys Med; 2009 Mar; 25(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 18440265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Database of normalised computed tomography dose index for retrospective CT dosimetry.
    Lee E; Lamart S; Little MP; Lee C
    J Radiol Prot; 2014 Jun; 34(2):363-88. PubMed ID: 24727361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Suggested diagnostic reference levels for paediatric X-ray examinations in India.
    Sonawane AU; Sunil Kumar JV; Singh M; Pradhan AS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(3):423-8. PubMed ID: 21147790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A study of the relationship between patient dose and size in paediatric radiology.
    Martin CJ; Farquhar B; Stockdale E; MacDonald S
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Sep; 67(801):864-71. PubMed ID: 7953228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Implications in medical imaging of the new ICRP thresholds for tissue reactions.
    Vañó E; Miller DL; Dauer L
    Ann ICRP; 2015 Jun; 44(1 Suppl):118-28. PubMed ID: 25816265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Management of patient dose in radiology in the UK.
    Martin CJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(3):355-72. PubMed ID: 22008582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Method of estimating patient skin dose from dose displayed on medical X-ray equipment with flat panel detector].
    Fukuda A; Koshida K; Yamaguchi I; Togashi A; Matsubara K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 May; 60(5):725-33. PubMed ID: 15213701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. State certification of mammography facilities. Final rule.
    Food and Drug Administration, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2002 Feb; 67(25):5446-69. PubMed ID: 11852885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimation of adult patient doses for common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Wad-madani, Sudan: derivation of local diagnostic reference levels.
    Suliman II; Mohammedzein TS
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2014 Jun; 37(2):425-9. PubMed ID: 24584663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Optimisation of X-ray examinations in Lithuania: start of implementation in mammography.
    Adliene D; Adlys G; Cerapaite R; Jonaitiene E; Cibulskaite I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):399-402. PubMed ID: 15933145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Establishing a quality control program for an automated dosimetry system.
    Li S; O'Dea TJ; Geise RA
    Med Phys; 1999 Aug; 26(8):1732-7. PubMed ID: 10501073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Electronic products; performance standard for diagnostic x-ray systems and their major components. Final rule.
    Food and Drug Administration, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2005 Jun; 70(111):33997-4042. PubMed ID: 15948306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of patient and staff doses during various CT fluoroscopy guided interventions.
    Buls N; Pagés J; de Mey J; Osteaux M
    Health Phys; 2003 Aug; 85(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 12938963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.