These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10029145)

  • 1. Failure of glove hole detection device for synthetic gloves.
    Neal JG; Jackson EM; Cox MJ; Thacker JG; Edlich RF
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1999; 48(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 10029145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In-use barrier integrity of gloves: latex and nitrile superior to vinyl.
    Rego A; Roley L
    Am J Infect Control; 1999 Oct; 27(5):405-10. PubMed ID: 10511487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in chemical permeation of disposable latex, nitrile, and vinyl gloves exposed to simulated movement.
    Phalen RN; Le T; Wong WK
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2014; 11(11):716-21. PubMed ID: 24689368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Permeability of nitrile rubber, latex, polyurethane, and neoprene gloves to 18 antineoplastic drugs.
    Connor TH
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 1999 Dec; 56(23):2450-3. PubMed ID: 10595805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of latex and nonlatex medical examination gloves during simulated use.
    Korniewicz DM; El-Masri M; Broyles JM; Martin CD; O'connell KP
    Am J Infect Control; 2002 Apr; 30(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 11944004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examination of several instruments for the electrical detection of holes in latex gloves during use.
    Stampfer JF; Salazar JA; Trujillo AG; Harris T
    J Clin Eng; 1996; 21(3):212-25. PubMed ID: 10157839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abrasion resistance of medical glove materials.
    Walsh DL; Schwerin MR; Kisielewski RW; Kotz RM; Chaput MP; Varney GW; To TM
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2004 Jan; 68(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 14689500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimated exposure of hands inside the protective gloves used by non-occupational handlers of agricultural pesticides.
    Beránková M; Hojerová J; Peráčková Z
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2017 Nov; 27(6):625-631. PubMed ID: 27578185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Permeation of gasoline, diesel, bioethanol (E85), and biodiesel (B20) fuels through six glove materials.
    Chin JY; Batterman SA
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Jul; 7(7):417-28. PubMed ID: 20455138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical performance of powder-free examination gloves.
    Fisher MD; Reddy VR; Williams FM; Lin KY; Thacker JG; Edlich RF
    J Emerg Med; 1999; 17(6):1011-8. PubMed ID: 10595890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of dental glove type on the penetration of liquid through experimental perforation: a spectrophotometric analysis.
    Checchi L; Montebugnoli L; Boschi S; D'Achille C
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Sep; 25(9):647-9. PubMed ID: 7568719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ease of donning of new powder-free non-latex and latex double-glove hole puncture indication systems.
    Edlich RF; Wind TC; Heather CL; Thacker JG
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2003; 13(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 14510282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of material properties on gloves' bacterial barrier efficacy in the presence of microperforation.
    Bardorf MH; Jäger B; Boeckmans E; Kramer A; Assadian O
    Am J Infect Control; 2016 Dec; 44(12):1645-1649. PubMed ID: 27388267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A laboratory-based study to assess the performance of surgical gloves.
    Korniewicz DM; El-Masri MM; Broyles JM; Martin CD; O'Connell KP
    AORN J; 2003 Apr; 77(4):772-9. PubMed ID: 12705733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomised trial of the durability of non-allergenic latex-free surgical gloves versus latex gloves.
    Newsom SW; Smith MO; Shaw P
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1998 Jul; 80(4):288-92. PubMed ID: 9771234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of double gloving with an intrinsic indicator system.
    Florman S; Burgdorf M; Finigan K; Slakey D; Hewitt R; Nichols RL
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2005; 6(4):385-95. PubMed ID: 16433603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choosing the right glove for the right purpose.
    Hunte SC
    Prof Nurse; 2004 Nov; 20(3):43-7. PubMed ID: 15552440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methyl methacrylate permeability of dental and industrial gloves.
    Thomas S; Padmanabhan TV
    N Y State Dent J; 2009; 75(4):40-2. PubMed ID: 19722481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A preliminary report on the incidence of pre-existing pinhole defects in nitrile dental gloves.
    Patel HB; Fleming GJ; Burke FJ
    Br Dent J; 2003 Nov; 195(9):509-12; discussion 505. PubMed ID: 14610561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing the level of dexterity offered by latex and nitrile SafeSkin gloves.
    Sawyer J; Bennett A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Apr; 50(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 16357028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.