BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10030647)

  • 1. Magnetic resonance imaging and cochlear implants: compatibility and safety aspects.
    Teissl C; Kremser C; Hochmair ES; Hochmair-Desoyer IJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Jan; 9(1):26-38. PubMed ID: 10030647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochlear implants: in vitro investigation of electromagnetic interference at MR imaging--compatibility and safety aspects.
    Teissl C; Kremser C; Hochmair ES; Hochmair-Desoyer IJ
    Radiology; 1998 Sep; 208(3):700-8. PubMed ID: 9722849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on internal magnet strength in Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implants.
    Wackym PA; Michel MA; Prost RW; Banks KL; Runge-Samuelson CL; Firszt JB
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Aug; 114(8):1355-61. PubMed ID: 15280707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic resonance imaging with the Digisonic SP Neurelec cochlear implant.
    Vincent C; Ruzza I; Vaneecloo FM; Dubrulle F
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Sep; 265(9):1043-6. PubMed ID: 18297299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The Safety of MR Conditional Cochlear Implant at 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging System].
    Takahashi D; Ogura A; Hayashi N; Seino S; Kawai R; Matsuda T; Doi T; Tsuchihashi T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Aug; 72(8):674-80. PubMed ID: 27546081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility testing of the Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant.
    Weber BP; Goldring JE; Santogrossi T; Koestler H; Tziviskos G; Battmer R; Lenarz Th
    Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):584-90. PubMed ID: 9752965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility and safety of the SOUNDTEC Direct System.
    Dyer RK; Nakmali D; Dormer KJ
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Aug; 116(8):1321-33. PubMed ID: 16885731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [MRI in patients with auditory implants equipped with implanted magnets-an update : Overview and procedural management].
    Nospes S; Brockmann MA; Läßig A
    Radiologe; 2019 Jan; 59(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 30350108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of a Novel 3T MRI Compatible Cochlear Implant Magnet: Torque, Forces, Demagnetization, and Imaging.
    Tysome JR; Tam YC; Patterson I; Graves MJ; Gazibegovic D
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Dec; 40(10):e966-e974. PubMed ID: 31524762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MR compatibility of Med EL cochlear implants: clinical testing at 1.0 T.
    Youssefzadeh S; Baumgartner W; Dorffner R; Gstöttner W; Trattnig S
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 9606372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with magnetic hearing implants: overview and procedural management].
    Nospes S; Mann W; Keilmann A
    Radiologe; 2013 Nov; 53(11):1026-32. PubMed ID: 24113904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety study of the Cochlear Nucleus 24 device with internal magnet in the 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner.
    Gubbels SP; McMenomey SO
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Jun; 116(6):865-71. PubMed ID: 16735911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MRI induced torque and demagnetization in retention magnets for a bone conduction implant.
    Jansson KJ; Håkansson B; Reinfeldt S; Taghavi H; Eeg-Olofsson M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Jun; 61(6):1887-93. PubMed ID: 24845299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pain Free 3 T MRI Scans in Cochlear Implantees.
    Todt I; Tittel A; Ernst A; Mittmann P; Mutze S
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e401-e404. PubMed ID: 28938274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MR Imaging and Cochlear Implants with Retained Internal Magnets: Reducing Artifacts near Highly Inhomogeneous Magnetic Fields.
    Edmonson HA; Carlson ML; Patton AC; Watson RE
    Radiographics; 2018; 38(1):94-106. PubMed ID: 29320320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of MRI compatibility of the modified nucleus multichannel auditory brainstem and cochlear implants.
    Heller JW; Brackmann DE; Tucci DL; Nyenhuis JA; Chou CK
    Am J Otol; 1996 Sep; 17(5):724-9. PubMed ID: 8892568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk of magnetic resonance imaging-induced magnet dislocation for different types of cochlear implants: a single-center retrospective study.
    Rupp R; Balk M; Sievert M; Leibl V; Schleder S; Allner M; Iro H; Hoppe U; Hornung J; Gostian AO
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Apr; 52(1):28. PubMed ID: 37085925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reversing the polarity of a cochlear implant magnet after magnetic resonance imaging.
    Jeon JH; Bae MR; Chang JW; Choi JY
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2012 Aug; 39(4):415-7. PubMed ID: 21889279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Demagnetization of cochlear implants and temperature changes in 3.0T MRI environment.
    Majdani O; Leinung M; Rau T; Akbarian A; Zimmerling M; Lenarz M; Lenarz T; Labadie R
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Dec; 139(6):833-9. PubMed ID: 19041512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MRI Artifacts and Cochlear Implant Positioning at 3 T In Vivo.
    Todt I; Rademacher G; Mittmann P; Wagner J; Mutze S; Ernst A
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):972-6. PubMed ID: 25634466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.