These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development. Chouinard MM Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2007; 72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. PubMed ID: 17394580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mechanisms of feature- and space-based attention: response modulation and baseline increases. McMains SA; Fehd HM; Emmanouil TA; Kastner S J Neurophysiol; 2007 Oct; 98(4):2110-21. PubMed ID: 17671104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pushing around the locus of selection: evidence for the flexible-selection hypothesis. Vogel EK; Woodman GF; Luck SJ J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1907-22. PubMed ID: 16356328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field? Snow JC; Mattingley JB Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cortical expressions of inhibition of return. Prime DJ; Ward LM Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1072(1):161-74. PubMed ID: 16445889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. No evidence for qualitative differences in the processing of short and long temporal intervals. Rammsayer T; Ulrich R Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):141-71. PubMed ID: 15907778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Exogenous influences on task set activation in task switching. Rubin O; Koch I Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jun; 59(6):1033-46. PubMed ID: 16885142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The interplay of spatial attention and memory: evidence for memory-driven spatial compatibility effects, but not for a facilitating role of attention in memory retrieval. Vankov I Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2124-9. PubMed ID: 21671154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An examination of interference effects in infants' memory for faces. Cohen LB; DeLoache JS; Pearl RA Child Dev; 1977 Mar; 48(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 844365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Representing response position relative to display location: influence on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility. Cho YS; Proctor RW Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Jul; 58(5):839-64. PubMed ID: 16194938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sex differences in the processing of flankers. Stoet G Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Apr; 63(4):633-8. PubMed ID: 20013515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The boundaries of sequential modulations: evidence for set-level control. Hazeltine E; Lightman E; Schwarb H; Schumacher EH J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1898-914. PubMed ID: 21767054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A dual-stage two-phase model of selective attention. Hübner R; Steinhauser M; Lehle C Psychol Rev; 2010 Jul; 117(3):759-84. PubMed ID: 20658852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Inhibition versus switching deficits in different forms of rumination. Whitmer AJ; Banich MT Psychol Sci; 2007 Jun; 18(6):546-53. PubMed ID: 17576269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Encoding and high-speed memory scanning of retarded and nonretarded adolescents. Maisto AA; Jerome MA Am J Ment Defic; 1977 Nov; 82(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 930965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A rational analysis of the effects of memory biases on serial reproduction. Xu J; Griffiths TL Cogn Psychol; 2010 Mar; 60(2):107-26. PubMed ID: 19879560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]