These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1003246)

  • 1. Quantitative assessment of cutaneous sensory function in subjects with neurologic disease.
    Conomy JP; Barnes KL
    J Neurol Sci; 1976 Dec; 30(2-3):221-35. PubMed ID: 1003246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of cutaneous electrical perceptual threshold in the assessment of sensory perception in patients with spinal cord injury.
    King NK; Savic G; Frankel H; Jamous A; Ellaway PH
    J Neurotrauma; 2009 Jul; 26(7):1061-8. PubMed ID: 19203209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differences between the tactile sensitivity on the anterior torso of normal individuals and those having suffered complete transection of the spinal cord.
    Saddiki-Traki F; Tremblay N; Dykes RW; Derraz S; El-Khamlichi A; Harrisson M
    Somatosens Mot Res; 1999; 16(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 10632035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative threshold changes in cutaneous sensation of patients with burns.
    Ward RS; Tuckett RP
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 1991; 12(6):569-75. PubMed ID: 1779012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of the cutaneous sensation of leprosy-suspected lesions using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and quantitative thermal testing.
    Villarroel MF; Orsini MB; Lima RC; Antunes CM
    Lepr Rev; 2007 Jun; 78(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 17824480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discrepancies between clinical assessments of sensory function and electrical perceptual thresholds after incomplete chronic cervical spinal cord injury.
    Macklin RA; Brooke VJ; Calabro FJ; Ellaway PH; Perez MA
    Spinal Cord; 2016 Jan; 54(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 26123212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationships between touch sensations and estimated population responses of peripheral afferent mechanoreceptors.
    Cohen RH; Vierck CJ
    Exp Brain Res; 1993; 94(1):120-30. PubMed ID: 8335067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Painful and non-painful pressure sensations from human skeletal muscle.
    Graven-Nielsen T; Mense S; Arendt-Nielsen L
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 159(3):273-83. PubMed ID: 15480607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A technique for the quantitative assessment of cutaneous sensory function in subjects with neurologic disease.
    Conomy JP; Barnes K
    Trans Am Neurol Assoc; 1974; 99():83-7. PubMed ID: 4463566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential effects of noxious conditioning stimulation of the cheek by capsaicin on human sensory and inhibitory masseter reflex responses evoked by tooth pulp stimulation.
    Kemppainen P; Waltimo A; Waltimo T; Könönen M; Pertovaara A
    J Dent Res; 1997 Sep; 76(9):1561-8. PubMed ID: 9294490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of cutaneous sensation in myelodysplastic children, using electrical stimulation.
    Dannenbaum R; Dykes RW
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 1984 Apr; 26(2):184-94. PubMed ID: 6724157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Introduction of automated systems to evaluate touch-pressure, vibration, and thermal cutaneous sensation in man.
    Dyck PJ; Zimmerman IR; O'Brien PC; Ness A; Caskey PE; Karnes J; Bushek W
    Ann Neurol; 1978 Dec; 4(6):502-10. PubMed ID: 742850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tactile unit properties after human cervical spinal cord injury.
    Thomas CK; Westling G
    Brain; 1995 Dec; 118 ( Pt 6)():1547-56. PubMed ID: 8595483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of algorithms of testing for use in automated evaluation of sensation.
    Dyck PJ; Karnes JL; Gillen DA; O'Brien PC; Zimmerman IR; Johnson DM
    Neurology; 1990 Oct; 40(10):1607-13. PubMed ID: 2215954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of current perception threshold electrical testing to clinical sensory testing for lingual nerve injuries.
    Ziccardi VB; Dragoo J; Eliav E; Benoliel R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 22079068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical vs quantitative evaluation of cutaneous sensation.
    Dyck PJ; O'Brien PC; Bushek W; Oviatt KF; Schilling K; Stevens JC
    Arch Neurol; 1976 Sep; 33(9):651-5. PubMed ID: 962647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The assessment of sensory detection thresholds on the perineum and breast compared with control body sites.
    Cordeau D; Bélanger M; Beaulieu-Prévost D; Courtois F
    J Sex Med; 2014 Jul; 11(7):1741-8. PubMed ID: 24805931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensory perception in uremic patients.
    Katims JJ; Taylor DN; Weseley SA
    ASAIO Trans; 1991; 37(3):M370-2. PubMed ID: 1751192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cutaneous perception thresholds of electrical stimulation methods: comparison of tDCS and tRNS.
    Ambrus GG; Paulus W; Antal A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Nov; 121(11):1908-14. PubMed ID: 20471313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual threshold to cutaneous electrical stimulation in patients with spinal cord injury.
    Savic G; Bergström EM; Frankel HL; Jamous MA; Ellaway PH; Davey NJ
    Spinal Cord; 2006 Sep; 44(9):560-6. PubMed ID: 16568143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.