These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1003337)

  • 1. Sex and race as factors affecting the attribution of insanity in a murder trial.
    McGlynn RP; Megas JC; Benson DH
    J Psychol; 1976 May; 93(1st Half):93-9. PubMed ID: 1003337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of defendant race and mental disorder type on mock juror decision-making in insanity trials.
    Maeder EM; Yamamoto S; McLaughlin KJ
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 68():101536. PubMed ID: 32033700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Juror decision making in not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder trials: Effects of defendant gender and mental illness type.
    Mossière A; Maeder EM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 49(Pt A):47-54. PubMed ID: 27237958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychiatric characteristics of homicide defendants.
    Martone CA; Mulvey EP; Yang S; Nemoianu A; Shugarman R; Soliman L
    Am J Psychiatry; 2013 Sep; 170(9):994-1002. PubMed ID: 23896859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An offer you cannot refuse: Plea offer size affects innocent but not guilty defendants' perceptions of voluntariness.
    Fessinger MB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Dec; 47(6):619-633. PubMed ID: 38127547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Informed decision making in persons acquitted not guilty by reason of insanity.
    Elliott RL; Nelson E; Fitch WL; Scott R; Wolber G; Singh R
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 8148513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sex, sexual orientation, and sexism: what influence do these factors have on verdicts in a crime-of-passion case?
    Ragatz LL; Russell B
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(4):341-60. PubMed ID: 20718220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
    Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
    J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Not guilty of murder by reason of paroxysmal insanity: the "mad" doctor vs. "common-sense" doctors in an 1865 trial.
    Spiegel AD; Spiegel MS
    Psychiatr Q; 1991; 62(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 1771196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence of gender bias in legal insanity evaluations: a case vignette study of clinicians, judges and students.
    Yourstone J; Lindholm T; Grann M; Svenson O
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2008; 62(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 18720232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revisiting the insanity defense: contested or consensus?
    Cirincione C
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 8807157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Was it murder or insanity? Reactions to a successful paroxysmal insanity plea in 1865.
    Spiegel AD; Spiegel AM
    Women Health; 1992; 18(2):69-86. PubMed ID: 1632102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Insanity plea: predicting not guilty by reason of insanity adjudications.
    Jeffrey RW; Pasewark RA; Bieber S
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3365477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of neuroimaging and brain injury on insanity defenses.
    Gurley JR; Marcus DK
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 18327829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of defendant race, victim race, and juror gender on evidence processing in a murder trial.
    Forsterlee R; Forsterlee L; Horowitz IA; King E
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):179-98. PubMed ID: 16557616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On finding for defendants who plead insanity: the crucial impact of dispositional instructions and opportunity to deliberate.
    Wheatman SR; Shaffer DR
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Apr; 25(2):167-83. PubMed ID: 11419381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beyond competence and sanity: the influence of pretrial evaluation on case disposition.
    Warren JI; Rosenfeld B; Fitch WL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):379-88. PubMed ID: 7841509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Juror knowledge and attitudes regarding mental illness verdicts.
    Sloat LM; Frierson RL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 15985664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Juror sensitivity to the cross-race effect.
    Abshire J; Bornstein BH
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):471-80. PubMed ID: 14593793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Racial Composition of Couples in Battered Spouse Syndrome Cases: A Look at Juror Perceptions and Decisions.
    Mossière A; Maeder EM; Pica E
    J Interpers Violence; 2018 Sep; 33(18):2867-2890. PubMed ID: 26917572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.