139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1003540)
1. Uterine cervical carcinoma in Connecticut, 1935-1973: evidence for two classes of invasive disease.
Laskey PW; Meigs JW; Flannery JT
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1976 Nov; 57(5):1037-43. PubMed ID: 1003540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evidence for regression of carcinoma-in-situ and for a second form of invasive cervical cancer, Connecticut 1935-73].
Meigs JW; Laskey PW; Flannery JT
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1976 Jul; 36(7):554-69. PubMed ID: 955362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [In situ and invasive cervical cancer epidemiology in the province of Girona, Spain 1990-2004: incidence, mortality, survival and screening history].
Castro Marqueta P; Moreno-Crespi J; Buxó-Pujolràs M; Cervantes-Amat M; Pérez-Gómez B; Marcos-Gragera R
Med Clin (Barc); 2011 Feb; 136(5):192-8. PubMed ID: 21051058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total burden and incidence of in situ and invasive cervical carcinoma in Michigan, 1985-2003.
Copeland G; Datta SD; Spivak G; Garvin AD; Cote ML
Cancer; 2008 Nov; 113(10 Suppl):2946-54. PubMed ID: 18980278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of cytologic screening on the detection of cervical carcinoma.
Yajima A; Mori T; Sato S; Wakisaka T; Suzuki M
Obstet Gynecol; 1982 May; 59(5):565-8. PubMed ID: 7070726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incidence trends in invasive uterine cervix cancer and carcinoma in situ in Incheon, South Korea.
Boo YK; Kim WC; Lee HY; Leem JH; Lee MH; Leem JS
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(8):1985-8. PubMed ID: 22292638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends in the incidence of in situ and invasive cervical cancer by age group and histological type in Korea from 1993 to 2009.
Oh CM; Jung KW; Won YJ; Shin A; Kong HJ; Jun JK; Park SY
PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e72012. PubMed ID: 23977194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of screening for cervical cancer in Sweden: trends in incidence and mortality 1958-1980.
Pettersson F; Björkholm E; Näslund I
Int J Epidemiol; 1985 Dec; 14(4):521-7. PubMed ID: 4086138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recent trends in the epidemiology of cervical neoplasia.
Greenberg RS; Chow WH; Liff JM
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):463-70. PubMed ID: 2750436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidence of invasive cancers following carcinoma in situ of the cervix.
Levi F; Randimbison L; La Vecchia C; Franceschi S
Br J Cancer; 1996 Oct; 74(8):1321-3. PubMed ID: 8883426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of preinvasive cancer of the cervix and the subsequent reduction in invasive cancer.
Bergström R; Adami HO; Gustafsson L; Pontén J; Sparén P
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 Jul; 85(13):1050-7. PubMed ID: 8515491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Appropriate frequency of mass-screening for uterine cervical cancer.
Iwanari O
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1987 Oct; 39(10):1799-805. PubMed ID: 3429977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical cancer rates by population size of towns: implications for cancer control programs.
Polednak AP; Flannery JT; Janerich DT
J Community Health; 1991 Dec; 16(6):315-23. PubMed ID: 1774347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk factors for progression of squamous cell cervical carcinoma in-situ to invasive cervical cancer: results of a multinational study.
Thomas DB; Ray RM; Qin Q;
Cancer Causes Control; 2002 Sep; 13(7):683-90. PubMed ID: 12296516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Geographic differences in invasive and in situ breast cancer incidence according to precise geographic coordinates, Connecticut, 1991-95.
Gregorio DI; Kulldorff M; Barry L; Samociuk H
Int J Cancer; 2002 Jul; 100(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 12115569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of screening on the incidence of cervical cancer in England and Wales.
Parkin DM; Nguyen-Dinh X; Day NE
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1985 Feb; 92(2):150-7. PubMed ID: 3970894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Declining use of radiotherapy for invasive cervical cancer in Connecticut: 1983-1990.
Polednak AP
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Aug; 58(2):226-9. PubMed ID: 7622109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes of morbidity and mortality from cancer of the cervix uteri in Puerto Rico.
Martínez I
Bol Asoc Med P R; 1984 Mar; 76(3):100-6. PubMed ID: 6586182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of a mass screening program on the risk of cervical cancer.
Hakama M; Räsänen-Virtanen U
Am J Epidemiol; 1976 May; 103(5):512-7. PubMed ID: 1274953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is screening for cervical cancer worthwhile?
Murphy JF
Ir J Med Sci; 1980 Aug; 149(8):318-25. PubMed ID: 7002861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
