These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10036454)

  • 1. The art of criticism.
    Parse RR
    Nurs Sci Q; 1998; 11(2):43. PubMed ID: 10036454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Receiving feedback from reviewers: how to make the most of criticism.
    Koop PM
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(4):148-50. PubMed ID: 10786470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critically evaluating research studies.
    Rogers B
    AAOHN J; 1995 Jan; 43(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 7695808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer review of nursing research proposals.
    Lindquist RD; Tracy MF; Treat-Jacobson D
    Am J Crit Care; 1995 Jan; 4(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7894558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reviewing a manuscript for publication: how do I do this?
    Koop PP
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(3):107-9. PubMed ID: 10703301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grant reviews: how to do them well.
    Koop PM
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 10703294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning to give and accept research critiques: some unique models.
    Ingram C
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 2000; 10(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 10887858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Making processes transparent.
    King KM
    Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2003; 13(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 12703104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reviewing and understanding research reports.
    Whitney JD
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 1999 Mar; 26(2):58-9. PubMed ID: 10373860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The "so what" question: the impact of nursing research.
    Mitchell PH
    J Prof Nurs; 2004; 20(6):347-8. PubMed ID: 15599866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In praise of peer reviewers and the peer review process.
    Peternelj-Taylor C
    J Forensic Nurs; 2010; 6(4):159-61. PubMed ID: 21114756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time.
    Clarke SP
    Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The introduction of a performance-based system for funding research.
    Smith T
    Nurs Prax N Z; 2006 Mar; 22(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 17205666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consider the source.
    Mason DJ
    Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Getting through the IRB: Covenant Medical Center Nursing Research Committee's experience.
    Butzow M
    J Emerg Nurs; 1995 Jun; 21(3):262-3. PubMed ID: 7630066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection].
    Clarke SP
    Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to critique a research study.
    Fosbinder D; Loveridge C
    Adv Pract Nurs Q; 1996; 2(3):68-71. PubMed ID: 9447093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The critique: a necessary part of scientific inquiry.
    Schmelzer M
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2006; 29(4):324-5. PubMed ID: 16974173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Skilled peer review: a road map to stronger scholarship.
    Kearney MH
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2006; 35(4):443. PubMed ID: 16881987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Writing a feature article: not all articles are alike.
    Pelletier LR
    Nurse Author Ed; 2003; 13(4):7-8. PubMed ID: 14562512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.