These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

660 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10037061)

  • 1. Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology.
    Gravel JS; Fausel N; Liskow C; Chobot J
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10037061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech recognition and comfort using hearing instruments with adaptive directional characteristics in asymmetric listening conditions.
    Mackenzie E; Lutman ME
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 16378001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Adaptive Hearing Aid Directionality and Noise Reduction on Masked Speech Recognition for Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.
    Browning JM; Buss E; Flaherty M; Vallier T; Leibold LJ
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Mar; 28(1):101-113. PubMed ID: 30938559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Potential Benefits and Limitations of Noise-Management Technologies for Children with Hearing Aids.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Miller S; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Dunn A; Browning S; Neumann S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Feb; 33(2):66-74. PubMed ID: 35512843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech intelligibility in noisy environments with one- and two-microphone hearing aids.
    Wouters J; Litière L; van Wieringen A
    Audiology; 1999; 38(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 10206518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):909-918. PubMed ID: 28738747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Benefit of Remote Microphones Using Four Wireless Protocols.
    Rodemerk KS; Galster JA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):724-731. PubMed ID: 26333880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of an adaptive, directional-microphone hearing aid.
    Ricketts T; Henry P
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Mar; 41(2):100-12. PubMed ID: 12212855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a BICROS System with a Directional Microphone in the Receiver and Transmitter.
    Valente M; Oeding K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):856-71. PubMed ID: 26554490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating Speech Recognition and listening effort with different device configurations in adult cochlear implant users.
    Sladen DP; Nie Y; Berg K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May; 19(3):119-130. PubMed ID: 29457564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Personal amplification for school-age children with auditory processing disorders.
    Kuk F; Jackson A; Keenan D; Lau CC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):465-80. PubMed ID: 19253780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of frequency importance functions to directivity for prediction of benefit in uniform fields.
    Ricketts TA; Henry PP; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):473-86. PubMed ID: 16230897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effects of FM and Hearing Aid Microphone Settings, FM Gain, and Ambient Noise Levels on SNR at the Tympanic Membrane.
    Norrix LW; Camarota K; Harris FP; Dean J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 26905531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving Cochlear Implant Performance in the Wind Through Spectral Masking Release: A Multi-microphone and Multichannel Strategy.
    Chung K
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):420-432. PubMed ID: 31425361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using Microphone Technology to Improve Speech Perception in Noise in Children with Cochlear Implants.
    Johnstone PM; Mills KET; Humphrey E; Yeager KR; Jones E; McElligott K; Pierce A; Agrawal S; Froeling C; Little JP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Oct; 29(9):814-825. PubMed ID: 30278866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.