148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10037283)
1. Multi-institutional assessment of the Provox 2 voice prosthesis.
Ackerstaff AH; Hilgers FJ; Meeuwis CA; van der Velden LA; van den Hoogen FJ; Marres HA; Vreeburg GC; Manni JJ
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1999 Feb; 125(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 10037283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective clinical phase II study of two new indwelling voice prostheses (Provox Vega 22.5 and 20 Fr) and a novel anterograde insertion device (Provox Smart Inserter).
Hilgers FJ; Ackerstaff AH; Jacobi I; Balm AJ; Tan IB; van den Brekel MW
Laryngoscope; 2010 Jun; 120(6):1135-43. PubMed ID: 20513030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and clinical evaluation of a second-generation voice prosthesis (Provox 2), designed for anterograde and retrograde insertion.
Hilgers FJ; Ackerstaff AH; Balm AJ; Tan IB; Aaronson NK; Persson JO
Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 Nov; 117(6):889-96. PubMed ID: 9442833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Groningen, Nijdam and Provox voice prostheses: a prospective clinical comparison based on 845 replacements.
Van Den Hoogen FJ; Oudes MJ; Hombergen G; Nijdam HF; Manni JJ
Acta Otolaryngol; 1996 Jan; 116(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 8820362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy. Initial clinical experience with the Provox-Vega® voice prosthesis and the SmartInserter® system].
Lorenz KJ; Maier H
HNO; 2010 Dec; 58(12):1174-83. PubMed ID: 20734017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro and in vivo comparison of the low-resistance Groningen and the Provox tracheosophageal voice prostheses.
Chung RP; Patel P; Ter Keurs M; Van Lith Bijl JT; Mahieu HF
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1998; 119(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 10089797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Device life of the Provox Vega voice prosthesis.
Hancock KL; Lawson NR; Ward EC
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Mar; 270(4):1447-53. PubMed ID: 22941391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A decade of postlaryngectomy vocal rehabilitation in 318 patients: a single Institution's experience with consistent application of provox indwelling voice prostheses.
Op de Coul BM; Hilgers FJ; Balm AJ; Tan IB; van den Hoogen FJ; van Tinteren H
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2000 Nov; 126(11):1320-8. PubMed ID: 11074828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. First clinical experience with a new non-indwelling voice prosthesis (Provox NID) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.
Hancock K; Houghton B; Van As-Brooks CJ; Coman W
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Sep; 125(9):981-90. PubMed ID: 16109676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of survival lifetime of the Provox and the Provox2 voice prosthesis.
Lequeux T; Badreldin A; Saussez S; Thill MP; Oujjan L; Chantrain G
J Laryngol Otol; 2003 Nov; 117(11):875-8. PubMed ID: 14670148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Voice restoration with voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy. Assessment of survival time of 378 Provox-1, Provox-2 and Blom-Singer voice prosthesis].
Schäfer P; Klützke N; Schwerdtfeger FP
Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Nov; 80(11):677-81. PubMed ID: 11702284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Device Life of Two Generations of Provox Voice Prostheses.
Thylur DS; Villegas BC; Fisher LM; Sinha UK; Kokot N
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Jun; 125(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 26747630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postlaryngectomy voice restoration using a voice prosthesis: a single institution's ten-year experience.
Mäkitie AA; Niemensivu R; Juvas A; Aaltonen LM; Bäck L; Lehtonen H
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2003 Dec; 112(12):1007-10. PubMed ID: 14703101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early speech results with the Provox prosthesis after laryngectomy.
Aust MR; McCaffrey TV
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Sep; 123(9):966-8. PubMed ID: 9305247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Provox 2
Mayo-Yáñez M; Cabo-Varela I; Dovalo-Carballo L; Calvo-Henríquez C; Martínez-Morán A; Herranz González-Botas J
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jul; 275(7):1827-1830. PubMed ID: 29799083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modification of the tracheal flange of the Provox voice prosthesis for easier insertion.
Vural E; Hanna E
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1999 Nov; 121(5):599-600. PubMed ID: 10547477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new low-resistance, self-retaining prosthesis (Provox) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.
Hilgers FJ; Schouwenburg PF
Laryngoscope; 1990 Nov; 100(11):1202-7. PubMed ID: 2233085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Device Life of the Tracheoesophageal Voice Prosthesis Revisited.
Lewin JS; Baumgart LM; Barrow MP; Hutcheson KA
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Jan; 143(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 27684464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pharyngolaryngectomy with free jejunal autograft reconstruction and tracheoesophageal voice restoration: Indications for replacements, microbial colonization, and indwelling times of the Provox 2 voice prostheses.
Reumueller A; Leonhard M; Mancusi G; Gaechter JN; Bigenzahn W; Schneider-Stickler B
Head Neck; 2011 Aug; 33(8):1144-53. PubMed ID: 21755558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy with the Provox voice prosthesis in South Africa.
Cornu AS; Vlantis AC; Elliott H; Gregor RT
J Laryngol Otol; 2003 Jan; 117(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 12590857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
