157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10048736)
1. Possible advantages and drawbacks of adding flexible sigmoidoscopy to hemoccult-II in screening for colorectal cancer. A randomized study.
Rasmussen M; Kronborg O; Fenger C; Jørgensen OD
Scand J Gastroenterol; 1999 Jan; 34(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 10048736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic yield in a biennial Hemoccult-II screening program compared to a once-only screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy and Hemoccult-II.
Rasmussen M; Fenger C; Kronborg O
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2003 Jan; 38(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 12608473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on the outcomes of subsequent faecal occult blood test screening.
Brown JP; Wooldrage K; Kralj-Hans I; Wright S; Cross AJ; Atkin WS
J Med Screen; 2019 Mar; 26(1):11-18. PubMed ID: 30282520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) screening study: baseline findings and implementations for clinical work-up in age groups 50-64 years.
Gondal G; Grotmol T; Hofstad B; Bretthauer M; Eide TJ; Hoff G
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2003 Jun; 38(6):635-42. PubMed ID: 12825872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Colorectal cancer screening with the addition of flexible sigmoidoscopy to guaiac-based faecal occult blood testing: a French population-based controlled study (Wintzenheim trial).
Denis B; Gendre I; Aman F; Ribstein F; Maurin P; Perrin P
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Dec; 45(18):3282-90. PubMed ID: 19665368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic performance of flexible sigmoidoscopy combined with fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: meta-analysis and modeling.
Niedermaier T; Weigl K; Hoffmeister M; Brenner H
Eur J Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 32(6):481-493. PubMed ID: 28667446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.
Tsoi KK; Ng SS; Leung MC; Sung JJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Aug; 28(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 18638075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for colorectal neoplasia with faecal occult blood testing compared with flexible sigmoidoscopy directly in a 55-56 years' old population.
Brevinge H; Lindholm E; Buntzen S; Kewenter J
Int J Colorectal Dis; 1997; 12(5):291-5. PubMed ID: 9401844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. One-time screening for colorectal cancer with combined fecal occult-blood testing and examination of the distal colon.
Lieberman DA; Weiss DG;
N Engl J Med; 2001 Aug; 345(8):555-60. PubMed ID: 11529208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing attendance and detection rate of colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer screening.
Segnan N; Senore C; Andreoni B; Azzoni A; Bisanti L; Cardelli A; Castiglione G; Crosta C; Ederle A; Fantin A; Ferrari A; Fracchia M; Ferrero F; Gasperoni S; Recchia S; Risio M; Rubeca T; Saracco G; Zappa M;
Gastroenterology; 2007 Jun; 132(7):2304-12. PubMed ID: 17570205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Hol L; van Leerdam ME; van Ballegooijen M; van Vuuren AJ; van Dekken H; Reijerink JC; van der Togt AC; Habbema JD; Kuipers EJ
Gut; 2010 Jan; 59(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 19671542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the occult blood test in screening for colorectal neoplasms. A prospective study using flexible endoscopy.
Reilly JM; Ballantyne GH; Fleming FX; Zucker KA; Modlin IM
Am Surg; 1990 Mar; 56(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 2316930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A community-based program of colorectal screening in an asymptomatic population: evaluation of screening tests and compliance.
Bat L; Pines A; Ron E; Niv Y; Arditi E; Shemesh E
Am J Gastroenterol; 1986 Aug; 81(8):647-51. PubMed ID: 3740023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.
Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Inadomi JM
Ann Intern Med; 2000 Oct; 133(8):573-84. PubMed ID: 11033584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Design, organization and management of a controlled population screening study for detection of colorectal neoplasia: attendance rates in the NORCCAP study (Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention).
Bretthauer M; Gondal G; Larsen K; Carlsen E; Eide TJ; Grotmol T; Skovlund E; Tveit KM; Vatn MH; Hoff G
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2002 May; 37(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 12059059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic subjects.
Gupta TP; Jaszewski R; Luk GD
Am J Med; 1989 May; 86(5):547-50. PubMed ID: 2496599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is the type of test used for mass colorectal cancer screening a determinant of compliance? A cluster-randomized controlled trial comparing fecal occult blood testing with flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Federici A; Marinacci C; Mangia M; Borgia P; Giorgi Rossi P; Guasticchi G
Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(4):347-53. PubMed ID: 16965874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hemoccult screening in detecting colorectal neoplasm: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value. Long-term follow-up in a large group practice setting.
Allison JE; Feldman R; Tekawa IS
Ann Intern Med; 1990 Mar; 112(5):328-33. PubMed ID: 2407166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy.
Winawer SJ; Flehinger BJ; Schottenfeld D; Miller DG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 Aug; 85(16):1311-8. PubMed ID: 8340943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
