87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10048946)
1. EMF working group.
Boorman GA
Environ Health Perspect; 1998 Dec; 106(12):A584. PubMed ID: 10048946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. "Why not use it all?" Another view.
Landrigan PJ
Environ Health Perspect; 1999 Nov; 107(11):A546. PubMed ID: 10627174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Declaring chemicals "not carcinogenic to humans" requires validation, not speculation.
Melnick RL; Kamel F; Huff J
Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Apr; 111(4):A203-4. PubMed ID: 12676636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Re: risk assessment of internal cancers from arsenic in drinking water.
Stöhrer G
Environ Health Perspect; 2001 Dec; 109(12):A571. PubMed ID: 11776955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Re: Carcinogenic and genotoxic potential of turf pesticides commonly used on golf courses.
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2005; 8(6):513-4; author reply 514-6. PubMed ID: 16188733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Carcinogenesis: problems and paradoxes. The 1981 George H. Gehrmann Lecture.
Kotin P
J Occup Med; 1982 Apr; 24(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 7069520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Carcinogens: are some risks acceptable?
Frank-Stromborg M; Krafka B; Gale D; Porter N
Am J Nurs; 1986 Jul; 86(7):814-7. PubMed ID: 3521288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Risking public credibility.
Feldmann EG
J Pharm Sci; 1979 Mar; 68(3):I. PubMed ID: 423111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Food safety: a sensible way to assess the risks.
Miya T
Am Med News; 1980 Mar; 23(11):suppl 2. PubMed ID: 10246039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Toward a sane national policy on food safety.
Nightingale EO; Robbins FC
Am Med News; 1980 Mar; 23(11):suppl 1-2. PubMed ID: 10246037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comment on "developing policy in the face of scientific uncertainty: interpreting 0.3 microT or 0.4 microT cutpoints from EMF epidemiologic studies" by Kheifets et al. in Risk Analysis, 25(4), 927-935.
Kundi M
Risk Anal; 2006 Jun; 26(3):579-81; author reply 583-4. PubMed ID: 16834616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Carcinogen testing & public information.
Upton AC
Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Feb; 10(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 7372460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Public health. Arsenic epidemiology and drinking water standards.
Smith AH; Lopipero PA; Bates MN; Steinmaus CM
Science; 2002 Jun; 296(5576):2145-6. PubMed ID: 12077388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Listing occupational carcinogens.
Freund A
Environ Health Perspect; 2005 Mar; 113(3):A152. PubMed ID: 15743702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Developing policy in the face of scientific uncertainty: interpreting 0.3 microT or 0.4 microT cutpoints from EMF epidemiologic studies.
Kheifets L; Sahl JD; Shimkhada R; Repacholi MH
Risk Anal; 2005 Aug; 25(4):927-35. PubMed ID: 16268940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Public health. Worldwide occurrences of arsenic in ground water.
Nordstrom DK
Science; 2002 Jun; 296(5576):2143-5. PubMed ID: 12077387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An evaluation of precaution-based approaches as EMF policy tools in community environments.
Sahl J; Dolan M
Environ Health Perspect; 1996 Sep; 104(9):908-11. PubMed ID: 8899365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Setting air quality standards for carcinogens: an alternative to mathematical quantitative risk assessment--discussion paper.
Maynard RL; Cameron KM; Fielder R; McDonald A; Wadge A
Hum Exp Toxicol; 1995 Feb; 14(2):175-86. PubMed ID: 7779442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cancer warnings for creosote and bisphenol.
J Environ Monit; 1999 Jun; 1(3):43N. PubMed ID: 11529120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Air toxics concentrations of methyl chloride.
Browning GR
Environ Health Perspect; 1999 Nov; 107(11):A546-7; author reply A547-8. PubMed ID: 10627176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
