BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10048946)

  • 21. Hormesis: implications for public policy regarding toxicants.
    Lave LB
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2001; 22():63-7. PubMed ID: 11274511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Organophosphate pesticides and public policy.
    Lockwood AH
    Curr Opin Neurol; 2002 Dec; 15(6):725-9. PubMed ID: 12447112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comment on "Developing policy in the face of scientific uncertainty: interpreting 0.3 microT or 0.4 microT cutpoints from EMF epidemiologic studies" by Kheifets et al. in Risk Analysis, 25(4), 927-935.
    O'Carroll MJ; Henshaw DL
    Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):285-7; author reply 289-90. PubMed ID: 17511696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [A regulatory view on the article: Risk evaluation of carcinogens and their threshold levels, part I-III].
    Dieter HH; Konietzka R
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2006 Sep; 49(9):921-5. PubMed ID: 16953360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dioxin and dioxin-like compounds in soil, Part II: technical support document for ATSDR policy guideline.
    De Rosa CT; Brown D; Dhara R; Garrett W; Hansen H; Holler J; Jones D; Jordan-Izaguirre D; O'Conner R; Pohl H; Xintaras C
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1999 Oct; 15(6):558-76. PubMed ID: 10560134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [What is the understanding of the scientific basis and the regulatory toxicology associated with the term "not appreciable " in the risk evaluation of carcinogens].
    Dieter HH; Konietzka R; Neumann HG
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1084-5. PubMed ID: 17676413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. 'Truth in packaging?' The unwrapping of epidemiologic research.
    Lanes SF; Poole C
    J Occup Med; 1984 Aug; 26(8):571-4. PubMed ID: 6481496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. FAA turns down the volume.
    Greene LA
    Environ Health Perspect; 2000 Apr; 108(4):A166. PubMed ID: 10753102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comments on "Children's health, susceptibility, and regulatory approaches to reducing risk from chemical carcinogens".
    Landrigan PJ; Mattison DR; Boardman B; Bruckner JV; Jackson RJ; Karol MH; Krewski D; Weil WB
    Environ Health Perspect; 2001 Sep; 109(9):A412-3. PubMed ID: 11673132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The risk assessment of cancer morbidity in the joint action of carcinogens].
    Shaĭkina OI; Shaĭkin AB; Kon'shina LG
    Gig Sanit; 1999; (1):41-3. PubMed ID: 10199078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Early indicators of response in biologically based risk assessment for nongenotoxic carcinogens.
    Gastel JA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Jun; 33(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 11407940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minutes of meeting: March 11-12, 1999: Working Group III Report: ethical, legal, and societal issues.
    U.S. National Institutes of Health. Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee
    Hum Gene Ther; 2000 May; 11(8):1237-42. PubMed ID: 11645217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Risk assessment of carcinogens in food.
    Barlow S; Schlatter J
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 243(2):180-90. PubMed ID: 19909764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Preimplantation embryos, research ethics, and public policy.
    Tauer CA
    Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(3):30-7. PubMed ID: 11653183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Risk assessment of carcinogens in food with special consideration of non-genotoxic carcinogens. Scientific arguments for use of risk assessment and for changing the Delaney Clause specifically.
    Williams GM; Karbe E; Fenner-Crisp P; Iatropoulos MJ; Weisburger JH
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 1996 Feb; 48(2-3):209-15. PubMed ID: 8672879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Vinyl chloride: a case study of data suppression and misrepresentation.
    Sass JB; Castleman B; Wallinga D
    Environ Health Perspect; 2005 Jul; 113(7):809-12. PubMed ID: 16002366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Public health vs. Philip Morris: is it a zero-sum game?
    Daynard RA
    J Public Health Policy; 2005 Dec; 26(4):469-73. PubMed ID: 16392745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. RU 486 and the politics of drug regulation in the United States and France.
    Kramnick RK
    Cornell Int Law J; 1992; 25():667-718. PubMed ID: 11656340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mechanistic and epidemiologic data: when is enough enough?
    Roberts R; Ashby J
    Environ Health Perspect; 2002 Sep; 110(9):A502-3. PubMed ID: 12269288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The logic of vaccination.
    Anderson R; May R
    New Sci; 1982 Nov; 96(1332):410-5. PubMed ID: 11655494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.