These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10049585)

  • 1. Comparative mapping of mouse and rat chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Grützner F; Himmelbauer H; Paulsen M; Ropers HH; Haaf T
    Genomics; 1999 Feb; 55(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 10049585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative genome mapping: mouse and rat homologies revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Scalzi JM; Hozier JC
    Genomics; 1998 Jan; 47(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 9465294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative karyotype of rat and mouse using bidirectional chromosome painting.
    Guilly MN; Fouchet P; de Chamisso P; Schmitz A; Dutrillaux B
    Chromosome Res; 1999; 7(3):213-21. PubMed ID: 10421381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Generation of five high-complexity painting probe libraries from flow-sorted mouse chromosomes.
    Weier HU; Polikoff D; Fawcett JJ; Greulich KM; Lee KH; Cram S; Chapman VM; Gray JW
    Genomics; 1994 Jun; 21(3):641-4. PubMed ID: 7959744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic analysis by chromosome sorting and painting: phylogenetic and diagnostic applications.
    Ferguson-Smith MA
    Eur J Hum Genet; 1997; 5(5):253-65. PubMed ID: 9412781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rat-mouse and rat-human comparative maps based on gene homology and high-resolution zoo-FISH.
    Nilsson S; Helou K; Walentinsson A; Szpirer C; Nerman O; Ståhl F
    Genomics; 2001 Jun; 74(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 11414756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mapping genomic rearrangements in titi monkeys by chromosome flow sorting and multidirectional in-situ hybridization.
    Dumas F; Bigoni F; Stone G; Sineo L; Stanyon R
    Chromosome Res; 2005; 13(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 15791414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Selective chromosome painting using in situ hybridization].
    Pérez Losada A; Woessner S; Solé F; Caballín MR; Florensa L
    Sangre (Barc); 1993 Apr; 38(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 8516730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative cytogenetics of human chromosome 3q21.3 reveals a hot spot for ectopic recombination in hominoid evolution.
    Yue Y; Grossmann B; Ferguson-Smith M; Yang F; Haaf T
    Genomics; 2005 Jan; 85(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 15607420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative physical mapping of targeted regions of the rat genome.
    Summers TJ; Thomas JW; Lee-Lin SQ; Maduro VV; Idol JR; Green ED
    Mamm Genome; 2001 Jul; 12(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 11420612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Polymerase chain reaction-based suppression of repetitive sequences in whole chromosome painting probes for FISH.
    Dugan LC; Pattee MS; Williams J; Eklund M; Sorensen K; Bedford JS; Christian AT
    Chromosome Res; 2005; 13(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 15791409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Karyotypic evolution of hapalomys inferred from chromosome painting: a detailed characterization contributing new insights into the ancestral murinae karyotype.
    Badenhorst D; Dobigny G; Robinson TJ
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2012; 136(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 22222239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative chromosome maps of neotropical rodents Necromys lasiurus and Thaptomys nigrita (Cricetidae) established by ZOO-FISH.
    Hass I; Müller S; Artoni RF; Sbalqueiro IJ
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2011; 135(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 21846965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A mouse chromosome-specific YAC probe collection for in situ hybridization.
    Mongelard F; Poras I; Usson Y; Batteux B; Robert-Nicoud M; Avner P; Vourc'h C
    Genomics; 1996 Dec; 38(3):432-4. PubMed ID: 8975723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative chromosome painting defines the high rate of karyotype changes between pigs and bovids.
    Frönicke L; Wienberg J
    Mamm Genome; 2001 Jun; 12(6):442-9. PubMed ID: 11353391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Whole-comparative genomic hybridization in domestic sheep (Ovis aries) breeds.
    Dávila-Rodríguez MI; Cortés-Gutiérrez EI; López-Fernández C; Pita M; Mezzanotte R; Gosálvez J
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2009; 124(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 19372665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physical mapping of chromosome 17 cosmids by fluorescence in situ hybridization and digital image analysis.
    Kallioniemi OP; Kallioniemi A; Mascio L; Sudar D; Pinkel D; Deaven L; Gray J
    Genomics; 1994 Mar; 20(1):125-8. PubMed ID: 8020940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative genome map of human and cattle.
    Solinas-Toldo S; Lengauer C; Fries R
    Genomics; 1995 Jun; 27(3):489-96. PubMed ID: 7558031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fluorescene in situ hybridization establishes homology between human and silvered leaf monkey chromosomes, reveals reciprocal translocations between chromosomes homologous to human Y/5, 1/9, and 6/16, and delineates an X1X2Y1Y2/X1X1X2X2 sex-chromosome system.
    Bigoni F; Koehler U; Stanyon R; Ishida T; Wienberg J
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1997 Mar; 102(3):315-27. PubMed ID: 9098501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Studies on karyotype evolution in higher primates in relation to human chromosome 14 and 9 by comparative mapping of immunoglobulin C epsilon genes with fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Tanabe H
    Kokuritsu Iyakuhin Shokuhin Eisei Kenkyusho Hokoku; 1999; (117):77-90. PubMed ID: 10859938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.