551 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10049793)
1. Regulatory cancer risk assessment based on a quick estimate of a benchmark dose derived from the maximum tolerated dose.
Gaylor DW; Swirsky Gold L
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Dec; 28(3):222-5. PubMed ID: 10049793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
Gaylor DW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Addressing nonlinearity in the exposure-response relationship for a genotoxic carcinogen: cancer potency estimates for ethylene oxide.
Kirman CR; Sweeney LM; Teta MJ; Sielken RL; Valdez-Flores C; Albertini RJ; Gargas ML
Risk Anal; 2004 Oct; 24(5):1165-83. PubMed ID: 15563286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cancer risk assessment for 1,3-butadiene: data integration opportunities.
Preston RJ
Chem Biol Interact; 2007 Mar; 166(1-3):150-5. PubMed ID: 16647696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acrylamide: review of toxicity data and dose-response analyses for cancer and noncancer effects.
Shipp A; Lawrence G; Gentry R; McDonald T; Bartow H; Bounds J; Macdonald N; Clewell H; Allen B; Van Landingham C
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2006; 36(6-7):481-608. PubMed ID: 16973444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chloroform mode of action: implications for cancer risk assessment.
Golden RJ; Holm SE; Robinson DE; Julkunen PH; Reese EA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Oct; 26(2):142-55. PubMed ID: 9356278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quick estimate of the regulatory virtually safe dose based on the maximum tolerated dose for rodent bioassays.
Gaylor DW; Gold LS
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1995 Aug; 22(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 7494904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of cancer slope factors using different statistical approaches.
Subramaniam RP; White P; Cogliano VJ
Risk Anal; 2006 Jun; 26(3):825-30. PubMed ID: 16834636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cancer dose--response assessment for acrylonitrile based upon rodent brain tumor incidence: use of epidemiologic, mechanistic, and pharmacokinetic support for nonlinearity.
Kirman CR; Gargas ML; Marsh GM; Strother DE; Klaunig JE; Collins JJ; Deskin R
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Oct; 43(1):85-103. PubMed ID: 16099568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental design constraints on carcinogenic potency estimates.
Rieth JP; Starr TB
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1989; 27(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 2754755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trichloroethylene cancer risk: simplified calculation of PBPK-based MCLs for cytotoxic end points.
Bogen KT; Gold LS
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Feb; 25(1):26-42. PubMed ID: 9056499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A cancer risk assessment of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate: application of the new U.S. EPA Risk Assessment Guidelines.
Doull J; Cattley R; Elcombe C; Lake BG; Swenberg J; Wilkinson C; Williams G; van Gemert M
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Jun; 29(3):327-57. PubMed ID: 10388618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of cancer risk estimates based on a variety of risk assessment methodologies.
Gold LS; Gaylor DW; Slone TH
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2003 Feb; 37(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 12662908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A procedure for developing risk-based reference doses.
Gaylor DW; Kodell RL
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Apr; 35(2 Pt 1):137-41. PubMed ID: 12051999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethyl methanesulfonate toxicity in Viracept--a comprehensive human risk assessment based on threshold data for genotoxicity.
Müller L; Gocke E; Lavé T; Pfister T
Toxicol Lett; 2009 Nov; 190(3):317-29. PubMed ID: 19443141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A simple method for quantitative risk assessment of non-threshold carcinogens based on the dose descriptor T25.
Sanner T; Dybing E; Willems MI; Kroese ED
Pharmacol Toxicol; 2001 Jun; 88(6):331-41. PubMed ID: 11453374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An adjustment factor for mode-of-action uncertainty with dual-mode carcinogens: the case of naphthalene-induced nasal tumors in rats.
Bogen KT
Risk Anal; 2008 Aug; 28(4):1033-51. PubMed ID: 18564993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of a unit risk factor for 1,3-butadiene based on an updated carcinogenic toxicity assessment.
Grant RL; Haney J; Curry AL; Honeycutt M
Risk Anal; 2009 Dec; 29(12):1726-42. PubMed ID: 19878488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A mechanism-based cancer risk assessment for 1,4-dichlorobenzene.
Butterworth BE; Aylward LL; Hays SM
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Nov; 49(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 17688981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
