These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10050948)

  • 1. The effects of the antagonist muscle force on intersegmental loading during isokinetic efforts of the knee extensors.
    Kellis E; Baltzopoulos V
    J Biomech; 1999 Jan; 32(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10050948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tibiofemoral joint forces during maximal isokinetic eccentric and concentric efforts of the knee flexors.
    Kellis E
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001 Mar; 16(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 11240058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of antagonist moment on the resultant knee joint moment during isokinetic testing of the knee extensors.
    Kellis E; Baltzopoulos V
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1997; 76(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 9286605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antagonist moment of force during maximal knee extension in pubertal boys: effects of quadriceps fatigue.
    Kellis E
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2003 May; 89(3-4):271-80. PubMed ID: 12736835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Muscle activation differences between eccentric and concentric isokinetic exercise.
    Kellis E; Baltzopoulos V
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1998 Nov; 30(11):1616-23. PubMed ID: 9813875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Isokinetic muscle strength and capacity for muscular knee joint stabilization in elite sailors.
    Aagaard P; Simonsen EB; Beyer N; Larsson B; Magnusson P; Kjaer M
    Int J Sports Med; 1997 Oct; 18(7):521-5. PubMed ID: 9414075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of fatigue on the resultant joint moment, agonist and antagonist electromyographic activity at different angles during dynamic knee extension efforts.
    Kellis E
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 1999 Jun; 9(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 10328414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Co-activation of vastus lateralis and biceps femoris muscles in pubertal children and adults.
    Kellis E; Unnithan VB
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1999 May; 79(6):504-11. PubMed ID: 10344460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Specificity of training velocity and training load on gains in isokinetic knee joint strength.
    Aagaard P; Simonsen EB; Trolle M; Bangsbo J; Klausen K
    Acta Physiol Scand; 1996 Feb; 156(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 8868268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Obesity is associated with higher absolute tibiofemoral contact and muscle forces during gait with and without knee osteoarthritis.
    Harding GT; Dunbar MJ; Hubley-Kozey CL; Stanish WD; Astephen Wilson JL
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Jan; 31():79-86. PubMed ID: 26476602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Knee joint forces during isokinetic knee extensions: a case study.
    Chow JW
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1999 Jun; 14(5):329-38. PubMed ID: 10521610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantification of quadriceps and hamstring antagonist activity.
    Kellis E
    Sports Med; 1998 Jan; 25(1):37-62. PubMed ID: 9458526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic joint and muscle forces during knee isokinetic exercise.
    Wei SH
    Proc Natl Sci Counc Repub China B; 2000 Oct; 24(4):161-8. PubMed ID: 11087068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic joint forces during knee isokinetic exercise.
    Kaufman KR; An KN; Litchy WJ; Morrey BF; Chao EY
    Am J Sports Med; 1991; 19(3):305-16. PubMed ID: 1867339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of intersegmental tibiofemoral joint forces and muscle activity during various closed kinetic chain exercises.
    Stuart MJ; Meglan DA; Lutz GE; Growney ES; An KN
    Am J Sports Med; 1996; 24(6):792-9. PubMed ID: 8947402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of muscle recruitment and its effect on joint reaction forces during knee exercises.
    Li G; Kawamura K; Barrance P; Chao EY; Kaufman K
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1998; 26(4):725-33. PubMed ID: 9662164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Muscular and tibiofemoral joint forces during isokinetic concentric knee extension.
    Baltzopoulos V
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1995 Jun; 10(4):208-214. PubMed ID: 11415554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of tibiofemoral joint forces and electromyographic activity during open and closed kinetic chain exercises.
    Wilk KE; Escamilla RF; Fleisig GS; Barrentine SW; Andrews JR; Boyd ML
    Am J Sports Med; 1996; 24(4):518-27. PubMed ID: 8827313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Angle-specific hamstring-to-quadriceps ratio: a comparison of football players and recreationally active males.
    Evangelidis PE; Pain MT; Folland J
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 25073098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of model complexity and problem formulation on the forces in the knee calculated using optimization methods.
    Hu CC; Lu TW; Chen SC
    Biomed Eng Online; 2013 Mar; 12():20. PubMed ID: 23496903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.