These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10051800)

  • 21. Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated?
    French SD; McDonald S; McKenzie JE; Green SE
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Oct; 5():33. PubMed ID: 16225692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Some problems with Cochrane reviews of diet and chronic disease.
    Truswell AS
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2005 Aug; 59 Suppl 1():S150-4; discussion S195-6. PubMed ID: 16052203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Significance of Cochrane collaboration for evidence-based medicine].
    Gøtzsche PC
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Jun; 97(26-27):3180-2. PubMed ID: 10925578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. National benchmarking between the Nordic countries on the quality of care.
    Mainz J; Hjulsager M; Og MT; Burgaard J
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):505-7. PubMed ID: 19072992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The practice of systematic reviews. XI. The Cochrane Library].
    Boluyt N; Scholten RJ; Offringa M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Dec; 147(52):2572-7. PubMed ID: 14723024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Do clinical experts rely on the Cochrane library?
    Grimes DA; Hou MY; Lopez LM; Nanda K
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Feb; 111(2 Pt 1):420-2. PubMed ID: 18238981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Evidence-based medicine. (Role of the Cochrane collaboration)].
    Bereczki D
    Orv Hetil; 1999 Mar; 140(12):643-6. PubMed ID: 10217955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Organisation of a proposed Cochrane Diet and Nutrition Field.
    Lodge M; Becker L; van Binsbergen J; van Weel C; Rosser W
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2005 Aug; 59 Suppl 1():S162-6; discussion S195-6. PubMed ID: 16052185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cochrane Collaboration helping unravel tangled web woven by international research.
    Huston P
    CMAJ; 1996 May; 154(9):1389-92. PubMed ID: 8616741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment.
    de Craen AJ; van Vliet HA; Helmerhorst FM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):311-3. PubMed ID: 15718121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Updating reviews: the experience of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.
    Soll RF
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 22 Suppl 1():29-32. PubMed ID: 18237349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodologically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatology.
    Collier A; Heilig L; Schilling L; Williams H; Dellavalle RP
    Br J Dermatol; 2006 Dec; 155(6):1230-5. PubMed ID: 17107394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Challenges and strategies of increasing the production and use of Cochrane reviews: the Argentinean experience.
    Ciapponi A
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 22 Suppl 1():4-9. PubMed ID: 18237346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in laboratory medicine: principles and methods].
    Watine J
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2004; 62(6):611-27. PubMed ID: 15563420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Treatment of patients and safety--significance of the Cochrane databases].
    Gøtzsche PC
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1995 Nov; 157(45):6247. PubMed ID: 7491715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Clinical trials in new databases. Scandinavia in the Cochrane network].
    Werkö L
    Lakartidningen; 1994 Mar; 91(9):837-8. PubMed ID: 8139353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cochrane Collaboration: more than systematic reviews?
    Green S; McDonald S
    Intern Med J; 2005 Jan; 35(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 15667459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.
    Royle PL; Bain L; Waugh NR
    Diabet Med; 2005 Oct; 22(10):1386-93. PubMed ID: 16176201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Cochrane Collaboration.
    Tecnologica; 1998 Dec; ():9-10, 15. PubMed ID: 10346737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.