146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10052009)
1. Medical screening and the value of early detection. When unwarranted faith leads to unethical recommendations.
Malm HM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 10052009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient education regarding cancer screening guidelines.
Mahon SM
Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2003; 7(5):581-4. PubMed ID: 14603556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: screening for lipid disorders in adults: recommendations and rationale.
Berg AO; Atkins D;
Am J Nurs; 2002 Jun; 102(6):91, 93, 95. PubMed ID: 12394084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: recommendations and rationale.
Berg AO
Am J Nurs; 2003 Jan; 103(1):73-80; discussion 81. PubMed ID: 12544063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Principles of cancer prevention and early detection.
Mahon SM
Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2000; 4(4):169-76. PubMed ID: 11261098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 4. The ethics of informed consent for preventive screening programs.
Marshall KG
CMAJ; 1996 Aug; 155(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 8752062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The ethics of informed consent in relation to prevention screening programmes.
O'Hagan J
N Z Med J; 1991 Mar; 104(908):121-3. PubMed ID: 1901399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Progress in prevention: should we screen for risk factors or disease? A current debate in the prevention of cardiovascular events.
Dennison CR; Hughes S
J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 24(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 19114796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk assessment for prevention of morbidity and mortality: lessons for pressure ulcer prevention.
Reynolds TM
J Tissue Viability; 2008 Nov; 17(4):115-20. PubMed ID: 19061825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening for chlamydia infection: recommendations and rationale. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Berg AO; Allan JD; Frame PS; Homer CJ; Lieu TA; Mulrow CD; Orleans CT; Peipert JF; Pender NJ; Sox HC; Teusch SM; Westhoff C; Woolf SH;
Am J Nurs; 2002 Oct; 102(10):87-92; discussion 93. PubMed ID: 12394311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening: new guidance on what and what not to do.
Campos-Outcalt D
J Fam Pract; 2007 Jun; 56(6):461-4. PubMed ID: 17543256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast screening--time for review.
Skegg D
N Z Med J; 2001 Jun; 114(1134):299. PubMed ID: 11480516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening for disease, cost-effectiveness, and guidelines.
Meyer DL
Prim Care; 1995 Dec; 22(4):591-9. PubMed ID: 8668731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Should low bone mass be treated?
Miller PD
Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2005; 50(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 16334416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence-based primary prevention?
Vineis P
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2000 Oct; 26(5):443-8. PubMed ID: 11103844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Osteoporosis detection: is BMD testing the future?
Olson AF
Nurse Pract; 2007 Jun; 32(6):20-7; quiz 28. PubMed ID: 17557021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical inquiries. Is there any benefit to Papanicolaou (Pap) test screening in women who have had a hysterectomy for benign disease?
Stevermer JJ; Wung L
J Fam Pract; 2001 Feb; 50(2):111-2. PubMed ID: 11219556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Dilemmas in the ethics of health-care research.
Jones C; Jack B
Prof Nurse; 1999 Apr; 14(7):452-5. PubMed ID: 10347524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical inquiries. What are appropriate screening tests for infants and children?
Biagioli FE; DeVoe JE; Hamilton A; WinklerPrins V
J Fam Pract; 2006 Sep; 55(9):803-8. PubMed ID: 16948966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening for dementia: recommendations and rationale.
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Am J Nurs; 2003 Sep; 103(9):87, 89, 91, 93, 95. PubMed ID: 14501480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
