121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10052332)
1. The real curse of Frankenfood.
Miller HI
Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Feb; 17(2):113. PubMed ID: 10052332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Environment regulations hinder biotech industry.
Miller HI
Nature; 2000 Aug; 406(6796):560. PubMed ID: 10949276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. US regulatory system for genetically modified [genetically modified organism (GMO), rDNA or transgenic] crop cultivars.
McHughen A; Smyth S
Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Jan; 6(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 17956539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. GM advisory panel is slanted, say critics.
Wadman M
Nature; 1999 May; 399(6731):7. PubMed ID: 10331376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Concerns over refuge size for US EPA-approved Bt corn.
Powell K
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):467-8. PubMed ID: 12721555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective.
Vasil IK
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Agbiotech issues climb US political agenda.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Dec; 20(12):1179-80. PubMed ID: 12454658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The curse of Frankenfood. Genetically modified crops stir up controversy at home and abroad.
Longman PJ
US News World Rep; 1999 Jul; 127(4):38-41. PubMed ID: 10539693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The environmental impact subterfuge.
Conko G; Miller HI
Nat Biotechnol; 2010 Dec; 28(12):1256-8. PubMed ID: 21139607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Don't rely on Uncle Sam.
Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7035):807. PubMed ID: 15829921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The biotechnology revolution and its regulatory evolution.
Hoffman DE
Drake Law Rev; 1988-1989; 38(3):471-550. PubMed ID: 16086466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. US Presidential transition prompts biotech policy frenzy.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Mar; 19(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 11231515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Playing catch-up.
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jun; 22(6):637. PubMed ID: 15175666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Will we reap what biopharming sows?
Miller HI
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):480-1. PubMed ID: 12721561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Puzzling industry response to ProdiGene fiasco.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jan; 21(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12511893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. US-Indian agbiotech deal under scrutiny.
Jayaraman KS
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):481. PubMed ID: 16680115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Gaps, inexperience, inconsistencies, and overlaps: crisis in the regulation of genetically modified plants and animals.
Mandal GN
William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Apr; 45(5):2167-259. PubMed ID: 16329219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Agricultural biotechnology: occupational health and regulatory issues.
Glass DJ
Occup Med; 1991; 6(2):301-10. PubMed ID: 2047979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A compilation of government regulation of biotechnology.
Hile JP; Keech BH; Gund CK; Connolly WM
Bioprocess Technol; 1991; 13():525-44. PubMed ID: 1367150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
