These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10052834)

  • 21. Prediction of the pure-tone average from the speech reception and auditory brainstem response thresholds in a geriatric population.
    Chien CH; Tu TY; Shiao AS; Chien SF; Wang YF; Li AC; Yang MJ
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(6):366-72. PubMed ID: 18984972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The intelligibility of sentences in quiet and in noise in aged listeners.
    Duquesnoy AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1136-44. PubMed ID: 6643835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reading Behind the Lines: The Factors Affecting the Text Reception Threshold in Hearing Aid Users.
    Zekveld AA; Pronk M; Danielsson H; Rönnberg J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):762-775. PubMed ID: 29450534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss.
    Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Snik AF; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):835-48. PubMed ID: 21970351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An Argument for Self-Report as a Reference Standard in Audiology.
    Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Fang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):206-222. PubMed ID: 29488871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The relationship between the intelligibility of time-compressed speech and speech in noise in young and elderly listeners.
    Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):401-8. PubMed ID: 11831813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
    Zokoll MA; Fidan D; Türkyılmaz D; Hochmuth S; Ergenç İ; Sennaroğlu G; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Identifying Subclinical Hearing Loss: Extended Audiometry and Word Recognition in Noise.
    Drennan WR
    Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 34727540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Adaptation of the STARR test for adult Italian population: A speech test for a realistic estimate in real-life listening conditions.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; De Seta E; Musacchio A; Mancini P
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):262-7. PubMed ID: 26795710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram.
    Smoorenburg GF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):421-37. PubMed ID: 1737889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Chinese Zodiac-in-Noise Test: An Internet-Based Speech-in-Noise Test for Large-Scale Hearing Screening.
    Zhou H; Meng Q; Liu X; Wu P; Shang S; Xiao W; Kang Y; Li J; Wang Y; Zheng N
    Ear Hear; 2024 Mar-Apr 01; 45(2):451-464. PubMed ID: 38062570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The French digit triplet test: a hearing screening tool for speech intelligibility in noise.
    Jansen S; Luts H; Wagener KC; Frachet B; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2010 May; 49(5):378-87. PubMed ID: 20380611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of an internet-based speech-in-noise screening test for school-age children.
    Sheikh Rashid M; Dreschler WA; de Laat JAPM
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):967-975. PubMed ID: 28936876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Relation between pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in various hearing-impaired listeners].
    He LP
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1993; 28(1):29-31, 59. PubMed ID: 8352994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Relationships between speech recognition threshold, average hearing level, and speech importance noise detection threshold.
    Letowski T; Hergenreder P; Tang H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Oct; 35(5):1131-6. PubMed ID: 1447923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Age Dependence of Thresholds for Speech in Noise in Normal-Hearing Adolescents.
    Jacobi I; Sheikh Rashid M; de Laat JAPM; Dreschler WA
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517743641. PubMed ID: 29212433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Efficient hearing screening in noise-exposed listeners using the digit triplet test.
    Jansen S; Luts H; Dejonckere P; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 23782715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.