These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Gene patents can be ethical. McGee G Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1998; 7(4):417-21. PubMed ID: 9752582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Patents to "treat me", no patents to "test me": an analysis of the 2009 Senate inquiry into gene patents. Triffett D J Law Med; 2010 May; 17(5):800-6. PubMed ID: 20552942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do patents impede the provision of genetic tests in Australia? Nicol D; Liddicoat J Aust Health Rev; 2013 Jun; 37(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 23702081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patents, medicine, and the interests of patients: applying general principles to gene patenting. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jan; 80(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 12578003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A brief guide to understanding patentability and the meaning of patents. Elliott GC Acad Med; 2002 Dec; 77(12 Pt 2):1309-14. PubMed ID: 12480641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The economics of human gene patents. Scherer FM Acad Med; 2002 Dec; 77(12 Pt 2):1348-67. PubMed ID: 12480645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Disease genes are not patentable: a rebuttal of McGee. Merz JF; Cho MK Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1998; 7(4):425-8. PubMed ID: 9752584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. American College of Medical Genetics position statement on gene patents and accessibility of gene testing. Genet Med; 1999; 1(5):237. PubMed ID: 11256680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Disease gene patenting: the clinician's dilemma. Magnus D Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1998; 7(4):433-5. PubMed ID: 9752586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Models for facilitating access to patents on genetic inventions. Van Overwalle G; van Zimmeren E; Verbeure B; Matthijs G Nat Rev Genet; 2006 Feb; 7(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 16385347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fortune and hindsight: gene patents' muted effect on medical practice. Sherkow JS; Abbott R Br Med Bull; 2018 Jun; 126(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 29608656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gene patents, health care policy and licensing schemes. Caulfield T; von Tigerstrom B Trends Biotechnol; 2006 Jun; 24(6):251-4. PubMed ID: 16621074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ACOG. Committee opinion: number 277, November 2002. Patients, medicine and the interests of patients: applying general principles to gene patenting. Comittee on Ethics, Comittee on Genetics, The American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Nov; 100(5 Pt 1):1051-6. PubMed ID: 12434779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of patents on the development of genome-based clinical diagnostics: an analysis of case studies. Pierce BL; Carlson CS; Kuszler PC; Stanford JL; Austin MA Genet Med; 2009 Mar; 11(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 19367193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prenatal diagnosis and female abortion: a case study in medical law and ethics. Dickens BM J Med Ethics; 1986 Sep; 12(3):143-4, 150. PubMed ID: 3761335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What's so special about the human genome? Caplan AL Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1998; 7(4):422-4. PubMed ID: 9752583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]