These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1005966)

  • 1. ["Directivity" in hearing aids (preliminary research)].
    Sanguy C; Olivier JC
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1976; 97(3-4):125-37. PubMed ID: 1005966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Towards a general measure of distortion.
    Levitt H; Cudahy E; Hwang WH; Kennedy E; Link C
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):283-92. PubMed ID: 3430387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pitch matching of electric and acoustic stimuli.
    Blamey PJ; Parisi ES; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():220-2. PubMed ID: 7668645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Use of differentiated frequency components in sound amplification in auditory prosthesis for patients with neurosensory deafness].
    Gekht IuK; Savel'eva EV
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1984; (1):22-5. PubMed ID: 6702056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech distortion measures for hearing aids.
    Williamson MJ; Cummins KL; Hecox KE
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 3430386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. From signal to dialogue.
    Rönnberg J; Arlinger S
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Nov; 47 Suppl 2():S1-2. PubMed ID: 19012105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Speech discrimination in prescence of noise in different kinds of hearing loss (author's transl)].
    Hahn R
    Audiology; 1974; 13(6):485-9. PubMed ID: 4410930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Perception of acoustic speech features with single channel cochlear implants and hearing aids. A comparative analysis].
    Dillier N; Spillmann T
    HNO; 1988 Aug; 36(8):335-41. PubMed ID: 3170279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Preliminary observations on the masking phenomenon. The passing band and harmonic distortion relative to the construction of a prosthesis adapted to an unusual case of perceptual deafness].
    Jouve R
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1976; 97(7-8):329-37. PubMed ID: 1013534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Syllabic compression and speech intelligibility in hearing impaired listeners.
    Verschuure J; Dreschler WA; de Haan EH; van Cappellen M; Hammerschlag R; Maré MJ; Maas AJ; Hijmans AC
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():92-100. PubMed ID: 8153570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new method of partial deafness treatment.
    Skarzyński H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A
    Med Sci Monit; 2003 Apr; 9(4):CS20-4. PubMed ID: 12709676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Extensive hearing loss and deafness in adults].
    Laszig R
    Ther Umsch; 1993 Sep; 50(9):647-52. PubMed ID: 8273025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Directional hearing aid based on array technology.
    Soede W; Bilsen FA; Berkhout AJ; Verschuure J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():20-7. PubMed ID: 8153561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longitudinal speech perception performance of young children with cochlear implants and tactile aids plus hearing aids.
    Eilers RE; Cobo-Lewis AB; Vergara KC; Oller DK
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 47():50-4. PubMed ID: 9428045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [New methods of hearing assessment in the youngest children (studies of a behavioral audiometry].
    Schlorhaufer W; Tasser C
    Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1966 Apr; 100(4):153-7. PubMed ID: 16114383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using a signal cancellation technique to assess adaptive directivity of hearing aids.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):496-511. PubMed ID: 17614507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Operative indications of total deafness].
    Meyer B; Chabolle F; Fugain C; Chouard CH
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1988; 105(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 3408095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of speech perception performance in children using a cochlear implant with children using conventional hearing aids, based on the concept of "equivalent hearing loss".
    Vermeulen AM; Snik AF; Brokx JP; van den Broek P; Geelen CP; Beijk CM
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 47():55-7. PubMed ID: 9428046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochlear implants in deaf children who previously utilized hearing aids successfully or suffered deteriorating loss.
    Yaremko RL; Gibson WP
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():217-9. PubMed ID: 7668643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Organ of vision in hard-of-hearing and deaf children; 3. Visual space localization].
    Remlein-Mozolewska G
    Klin Oczna; 1974 Jun; 44(6):547-52. PubMed ID: 4849312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.