These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10063569)

  • 1. [Value of mammography and ultrasound in diagnosis of breast carcinoma].
    Muth CP
    Zentralbl Chir; 1998; 123 Suppl 5():33-6. PubMed ID: 10063569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Imaging methods in diagnosis and differential diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Kessler M; Milz P; Sittek H; Reiser M
    Bildgebung; 1995 Sep; 62(3):160-72. PubMed ID: 7496112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Diagnosis of the site and extent of breast carcinoma].
    Kessler M; Milz P; Sittek H; Schnarkowski P; Schmidt D; Bredl T; Reiser M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jan; 5(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 7888430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Diseases of the female breast: screening, mammography, ultrasound].
    Otto RC
    Ther Umsch; 1993 May; 50(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 8378888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Indications for and comparative diagnostic value of combined ultrasound and X-ray mammography.
    Novak D
    Eur J Radiol; 1983 Aug; 3 Suppl 1():299-302. PubMed ID: 6628417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Present-day diagnostic techniques in breast nodes].
    Sovtsov SA; Mikhaĭlova SA
    Ter Arkh; 1998; 70(10):42-6. PubMed ID: 9864803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of mammography and automated sonography in 700 patients].
    Kessler M; Igl W; Krauss B; Bassermann R; Bohmert DH; Eiermann W; Lohe KJ; Lissner J
    Rofo; 1983 Mar; 138(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 6403428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
    Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Mammography and ultrasound in the diagnosis of clinically occult breast cancer].
    Gyr T; Almendral AC; Meier D
    Gynakol Rundsch; 1989; 29(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 2544492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast cancer screening and problem solving using mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hooley RJ; Andrejeva L; Scoutt LM
    Ultrasound Q; 2011 Mar; 27(1):23-47. PubMed ID: 21343800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Palpable masses in breast during lactation.
    Obenauer S; Dammert S
    Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 17189838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Interventional radiology in nonpalpable lesions of the breast].
    Tardivon A; Meunier M; El Khoury C; Thibault F
    J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 84(4 Pt 1):381-6. PubMed ID: 12759651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rationale and technique of clinical breast examination.
    Freund KM
    Medscape Womens Health; 2000 Nov; 5(6):E2. PubMed ID: 11320350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differentiation of mammographically suspicious lesions: evaluation of breast ultrasound, MRI mammography and electrical impedance scanning as adjunctive technologies in breast cancer detection.
    Malich A; Boehm T; Facius M; Freesmeyer MG; Fleck M; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Apr; 56(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 11286578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical assessment of a breast mass: a case study.
    Leslie NS; Leight SB
    Clin Excell Nurse Pract; 1999 May; 3(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 10646408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of the diagnostic value of the individual examination steps (triple diagnosis) in breast cysts].
    Fitzal P; Wolf G
    Ultraschall Med; 1990 Aug; 11(4):202-5. PubMed ID: 2259915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differentiation of benign and malignant sub-1 cm breast lesions using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
    Gibbs P; Liney GP; Lowry M; Kneeshaw PJ; Turnbull LW
    Breast; 2004 Apr; 13(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 15019691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The validity of complex breast cysts after surgery.
    Tea MK; Grimm C; Fink-Retter A; Bikas D; Kroiss R; Kubista E; Wagner T
    Am J Surg; 2009 Feb; 197(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 18649871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.