BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10063569)

  • 1. [Value of mammography and ultrasound in diagnosis of breast carcinoma].
    Muth CP
    Zentralbl Chir; 1998; 123 Suppl 5():33-6. PubMed ID: 10063569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Imaging methods in diagnosis and differential diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Kessler M; Milz P; Sittek H; Reiser M
    Bildgebung; 1995 Sep; 62(3):160-72. PubMed ID: 7496112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Diagnosis of the site and extent of breast carcinoma].
    Kessler M; Milz P; Sittek H; Schnarkowski P; Schmidt D; Bredl T; Reiser M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jan; 5(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 7888430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Diseases of the female breast: screening, mammography, ultrasound].
    Otto RC
    Ther Umsch; 1993 May; 50(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 8378888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Indications for and comparative diagnostic value of combined ultrasound and X-ray mammography.
    Novak D
    Eur J Radiol; 1983 Aug; 3 Suppl 1():299-302. PubMed ID: 6628417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Present-day diagnostic techniques in breast nodes].
    Sovtsov SA; Mikhaĭlova SA
    Ter Arkh; 1998; 70(10):42-6. PubMed ID: 9864803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of mammography and automated sonography in 700 patients].
    Kessler M; Igl W; Krauss B; Bassermann R; Bohmert DH; Eiermann W; Lohe KJ; Lissner J
    Rofo; 1983 Mar; 138(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 6403428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
    Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Mammography and ultrasound in the diagnosis of clinically occult breast cancer].
    Gyr T; Almendral AC; Meier D
    Gynakol Rundsch; 1989; 29(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 2544492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast cancer screening and problem solving using mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hooley RJ; Andrejeva L; Scoutt LM
    Ultrasound Q; 2011 Mar; 27(1):23-47. PubMed ID: 21343800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Palpable masses in breast during lactation.
    Obenauer S; Dammert S
    Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 17189838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Interventional radiology in nonpalpable lesions of the breast].
    Tardivon A; Meunier M; El Khoury C; Thibault F
    J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 84(4 Pt 1):381-6. PubMed ID: 12759651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rationale and technique of clinical breast examination.
    Freund KM
    Medscape Womens Health; 2000 Nov; 5(6):E2. PubMed ID: 11320350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differentiation of mammographically suspicious lesions: evaluation of breast ultrasound, MRI mammography and electrical impedance scanning as adjunctive technologies in breast cancer detection.
    Malich A; Boehm T; Facius M; Freesmeyer MG; Fleck M; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Apr; 56(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 11286578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical assessment of a breast mass: a case study.
    Leslie NS; Leight SB
    Clin Excell Nurse Pract; 1999 May; 3(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 10646408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of the diagnostic value of the individual examination steps (triple diagnosis) in breast cysts].
    Fitzal P; Wolf G
    Ultraschall Med; 1990 Aug; 11(4):202-5. PubMed ID: 2259915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differentiation of benign and malignant sub-1 cm breast lesions using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
    Gibbs P; Liney GP; Lowry M; Kneeshaw PJ; Turnbull LW
    Breast; 2004 Apr; 13(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 15019691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The validity of complex breast cysts after surgery.
    Tea MK; Grimm C; Fink-Retter A; Bikas D; Kroiss R; Kubista E; Wagner T
    Am J Surg; 2009 Feb; 197(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 18649871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.